Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112074›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2022

Preferences and Insights for Participation in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Prevention Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Chelsie L Fleischer, Elizabeth A Bemis, Marie L Feser, Vasilisa A Kormendi, Alvina Zhang, Katherine Ketcham, Sharon D White, Christopher C Striebich, Kevin D Deane, Mark Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Determinants of Infant Participation and Non-Participation in Primary Prevention Trials.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chelsie L FleischerUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-7618
Elizabeth A BemisUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Marie L FeserUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Vasilisa A KormendiUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Alvina ZhangUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Katherine KetchamUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Sharon D WhiteUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Christopher C StriebichUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Kevin D DeaneUniversity of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-4861
Mark HarrisonUniversity of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research 16813William P. Arend Rheumatology Research Endowment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn rheumatoid arthritis (RA), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) can be elevated prior to inflammatory arthritis (IA). The potential to intervene in people with ACPA positivity underpins the development of prevention trials in RA. The Research Participation Influences Study examined factors influencing the decisions of individuals who are ACPA(+) to participate in a prevention trial using qualitative and quantitative methods.

methodsIndividuals with ACPA positivity without IA were provided information regarding their risk for future RA, were provided a description of a clinical prevention trial using hydroxychloroquine, and were asked if they would participate in the trial. After agreeing to or declining participation, they were surveyed on what influenced their decision using Likert scales and open-response questions.

resultsThirty-nine individuals who agreed to trial participation (enrollees) and 31 individuals who declined (nonenrollees) completed surveys. Enrollees expressed greater perceived risk for RA and greater perception of benefit to themselves or others than nonenrollees. Nonenrollees expressed greater concern about medication effects and less personal or family experience with RA than enrollees. There was a higher proportion of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with RA in enrollees versus nonenrollees (54% vs. 23%, P = 0.01).

conclusionEnrollees were more likely than nonenrollees to be FDRs, exhibit stronger concern for personal risk for RA, and have less concern about adverse effects. Further exploration is needed to determine why these differences were present, including exploration of symptoms and the role of family history. Understanding these issues will better inform researchers and individuals who are candidates for prevention.

Identifiers

PMID36112074
PMCPMC9661822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.