Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112016›Full record

ArticleCognitive neuroscience2022

A way forward for design and analysis of neuroimaging studies of memory consolidation.

Catherine W Tallman, Robert E Clark, Christine N Smith

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine W TallmanDepartment of Psychology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7709-264X
Robert E ClarkDepartment of Psychiatry, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0235-856X
Christine N SmithVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Research Service, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-4131

Funding

MEMORY SYSTEMS OF THE MAMMALIAN BRAINR01MH024600 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SQUIRE, LARRY R · 1985 to 2020
$10.0M
Functional and Structural Neuroanatomy of Past RemembranceI01CX001375 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI SMITH, CHRISTINE NICOLE · 2017 to 2021
–
MEMORY AS AFFECTED IN INJURY, DISEASE, AND ECTR37MH024600 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI SQUIRE, LARRY R · 1990 to 1999
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001375NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH024600NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH024600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several novel ideas and suggestions were made in response to our discussion paper (Tallman et al., this issue). Careful consideration of the content and context of memory while accounting for the neuroanatomy and functional specialization of the hippocampus may reveal more consistent patterns in fMRI studies of memory consolidation. Below we address these ideas as well as issues that arise when interpreting the fMRI signal in memory consolidation studies. In addition, we describe new analyses suggested by the commentators that clarify our findings with respect to current theories.

Indexed as

Memory ConsolidationHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingfunctional connectivityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingRetrograde memory

Identifiers

PMID36112016
PMCPMC9673460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.