Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111806›Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2023

Pain coping tools for children and young adults with a neurodevelopmental disability: A systematic review of measurement properties.

Nadine L Smith, Meredith G Smith, Noula Gibson, Christine Imms, Ashleigh L Thornton, Adrienne R Harvey

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The comprehensibility and feasibility of the modified brief pain inventory and fear of pain questionnaire adapted for children and young people with cerebral palsy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nadine L SmithKids Rehab WA, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-4713
Meredith G SmithSchool of Allied Health Science and Practice, The University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Noula GibsonKids Rehab WA, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0183-9214
Christine ImmsDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9055-3554
Ashleigh L ThorntonKids Rehab WA, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Adrienne R HarveyDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo systematically identify and evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and observer-reported outcome measures (parent proxy report) of pain coping tools that have been used with children and young adults (aged 0-24 years) with a neurodevelopmental disability.

methodA two-stage search using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo was conducted. Search 1 in August 2021 identified pain coping tools used in neurodevelopmental disability and search 2 in September 2021 located additional studies evaluating the measurement properties of these tools. Methodological quality was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines (PROSPERO protocol registration no. CRD42021273031).

resultsSixteen studies identified seven pain coping tools, all PROMs and observer-reported outcome measures (parent proxy report) versions. The measurement properties of the seven tools were appraised in 44 studies. No tool had high-quality evidence for any measurement property or evidence for all nine measurement properties as outlined by COSMIN. Only one tool had content validity for individuals with neurodevelopmental disability: the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life tool.

interpretationPain coping assessment tools with self-report and parent proxy versions are available; however, measurement invariance has not been tested in young adults with a neurodevelopmental disability. This is an area for future research.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalChildHumansPainPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36111806
PMCPMC10952855
OpenAlexW4296031381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.