Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111649›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2022

Cellular dissociation grading on biopsies of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma provides prognostic information across all stages and is congruent with resection specimen grading.

Moritz Jesinghaus, Melanie Boxberg, Maxime Schmitt, Mark Kriegsmann, Alexander Harms, Corinna Lang, Thomas Muley, Hauke Winter, Katharina Kriegsmann, Arne Warth and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Moritz Jesinghaus *Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-5661
Melanie Boxberg *Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maxime SchmittInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Mark KriegsmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7319-3646
Alexander HarmsInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Corinna LangInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas MuleyMember of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hauke WinterMember of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina KriegsmannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arne WarthInstitute of Pathology, Wetzlar, Germany.
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hans HoffmannDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI), Munich, Germany.
Seyer SafiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI), Munich, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DETUM Klinikum · DEDanaher (Germany) · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEMunich School of Philosophy · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grading of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) based on tumour budding and cell nest size has been termed cellular dissociation grading (CDG) and was suggested as a robust outcome predictor when assessed in biopsies and resections of various extrapulmonary SCCs. In pulmonary SCC (pSCC), this has so far been shown only for resected cancers. As most lung cancers are inoperable, it is of utmost importance to clarify whether the prognostic impact of CDG is retained in the biopsy setting. Two independent pSCC biopsy cohorts from Munich (n = 134, non-resected) and Heidelberg (n = 135, resected) were assessed. Tumour budding and cell nest size measures were assembled into the three-tiered CDG system (G1-G3). Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall- (OS), disease-specific- (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Interobserver variability and concordance between biopsy and resection specimen were also investigated. CDG was highly congruent between biopsy and resection specimens (κ = 0.77, p < 0.001). In both pSCC cohorts, biopsy-derived CDG strongly impacted on OS, DSS, and DFS (e.g. DFS: p < 0.001). In multivariate survival analyses, CDG remained a stage independent predictor of survival in both cohorts (DFS: p < 0.001 respectively; hazard ratio Munich cohort: CDG-G2: 4.31, CDG-G3; 5.14; Heidelberg cohort: CDG-G2: 5.87, CDG-G3: 9.07). Interobserver agreement for CDG was almost perfect (κ = 0.84, p < 0.001). We conclude that assessment of CDG based on tumour budding and cell nest size is feasible on pSCC biopsies and harbours stage independent prognostic information in resectable as well as non-resectable pSCC. Integration of this grading approach into clinicopathological routine should be considered.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellBiopsyDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasm GradingPrognosisbiopsycell nest sizecellular dissociation gradinglungsquamous cell carcinomatumour budding

Identifiers

PMID36111649
PMCPMC9535098
OpenAlexW4296038372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.