Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111491›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2022

Comparison of single‑nucleus and single‑cell transcriptomes in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue.

Fei Wen, Xiaojie Tang, Lin Xu, Haixia Qu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A new hope for pulmonary hypoplasia: amniotic fluid stem cell extracellular vesicles?Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fei WenSchool of Clinical Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, P.R. China.
Xiaojie TangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, P.R. China.
Lin XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Shinan, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, P.R. China.
Haixia QuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Shinan, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, P.R. China.
Qingdao Municipal Hospital · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single‑nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA‑seq) is a method used to analyze gene expression in cells for which isolation is complex, such as those in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues. It constitutes an alternative to single‑cell RNA sequencing (scRNA‑seq) by analyzing the nucleus rather than the whole cell; however, whether it can completely replace scRNA‑seq in HCC remains to be clarified. In the present study, scRNA‑seq was compared with snRNA‑seq in tumor tissue obtained from patients with HCC, using the 10X Genomics Chromium platform. Seurat was also used to process the data and compare the differences between the two sequencing methods in identifying different cell types. In the present study, the transcriptomes of 14,349 single nuclei and 9,504 single cells were obtained from the aforementioned HCC tissue. A total of 21 discrete cell clusters, including hepatocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, B cells, T cells, natural killer cells and macrophages were identified. Notably, a high number of hepatocytes were detected using snRNA‑seq, while an increased number of immunocytes were identified in the tumor microenvironment using scRNA‑seq. Results of the present study provided a comprehensive image of human HCC at a single‑cell resolution. Moreover, results of the present study further demonstrated that snRNA‑seq may be adequate in replacing scRNA‑seq in certain cases, and snRNA‑seq performs at an improved level in hepatocyte sequencing. Combined use of the two sequencing methods may contribute to the study of intercellular interactions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsEndothelial CellsHumansRNA, Small NuclearSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentRNA, Small Nuclearhepatocellular carcinomasingle‑cell RNA sequencingsingle‑nucleus RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36111491
PMCPMC9494604
OpenAlexW4296038865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.