Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111461›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2022

Effects of lithium on suicide and suicidal behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Zainab Nabi, Jacki Stansfeld, Martin Plöderl, Lisa Wood, Joanna Moncrieff

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. History of Suicide Prevention with Lithium Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zainab NabiDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, GB.
Jacki StansfeldDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, GB.
Martin PlöderlDepartment for Clinical Psychology and Department for Inpatient Psychotherapy and Crisis Intervention, University Clinic for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4659-9314
Lisa WoodDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, GB.
Joanna MoncrieffDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, GB.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-6974
University College London · GBParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLithium has long been believed to reduce the risk of suicide and suicidal behaviour in people with mood disorders. Previous meta-analyses appeared to support this belief, but excluded relevant data due to the difficulty of conducting meta-analysis of rare events. The current study is an updated systematic review and meta-analysis that includes all eligible data, and evaluates suicide, non-fatal suicidal behaviour (including suicidal ideation) and suicide attempts.

methodsWe searched PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase and some trial registers. We included all randomised trials comparing lithium and placebo or treatment as usual in mood disorders published after 2000, to ensure suicide was reliably reported. Trial quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Pooled data were analysed using Fisher's Exact test. In addition, meta-analysis was conducted using various methods, prioritizing the Exact method. All trials were included in the analysis of suicide initially, regardless of whether they reported on suicide or not. We conducted a sensitivity analysis with trials that specifically reported on suicides and one that included trials published before 2000. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed involving suicide prevention trials, trials excluding people already taking lithium, trials involving people with bipolar disorder exclusively and those involving people with mixed affective diagnoses. Non-fatal suicidal behaviour and suicide attempts were analysed using the same methods, but only trials that reported these outcomes were included. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021265809.

resultsTwelve eligible studies involving 2578 participants were included. The pooled suicide rate was 0.2% for people randomised to lithium and 0.4% with placebo or treatment as usual, which was not a statistically significant difference; odds ratio (OR) = 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.03-2.49),

conclusionsEvidence from randomised trials is inconclusive and does not support the idea that lithium prevents suicide or suicidal behaviour.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderSuicidal IdeationHumansLithiumMood DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuicide, AttemptedLithiumBipolar disorderdepressionlithiummood disorders unipolarsuicide

Identifiers

PMID36111461
PMCPMC9533115
OpenAlexW4296033942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.