ArticleCureus2022
Characteristics of Choanal Atresia in Patients With Congenital Anomalies: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Choanal atresia (CA) is an uncommon congenital anomaly. There are various syndromes that are associated with CA. The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in CA's presentation and outcome when associated with other congenital anomalies and syndromes. Method This is a retrospective review study of all children (18 years and younger) who underwent CA repair in a tertiary referral healthcare center from January 2005 to April 2022. Demographics, comorbidities, radiological testing, operative reports, and outpatient reports were collected. Success was determined as a child with bilateral patent choana that is able to breathe from both nostrils comfortably. Result Twenty-four patients met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Bilateral CA was present in 15 (62.5%) patients. Mixed CA was the most common variant. There were various congenital anomalies in association with CA patients who are yet to be classified into a syndrome. The most common congenital anomaly was cleft lip and palate. Bony and mixed types were significantly associated with non-syndromic patients (p<0.05). Twenty patients (83%) were diagnosed with CA at age of less than one year, and four patients were diagnosed after one year of age. There were 36 surgeries performed on 24 patients, of which 27 were endoscopic and nine were using Hugher dilator. The overall success rate for CA repair was 50%. The median number of revisions per patient was 0.5. Conclusion CA is a challenging anomaly to repair. There are various factors that influence the outcome of children with CA. Otolaryngologists should counsel the patient and their families regarding possible need for revision especially in those with other craniofacial anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.