Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111284›Full record

ArticleData in brief2022

An extensive dataset for successful recognition of fresh and rotten fruits.

Nusrat Sultana, Musfika Jahan, Mohammad Shorif Uddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nusrat SultanaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Musfika JahanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Shorif UddinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of rotten fruits is very crucial for agricultural productions and fruit processing as well as packaging industries. Usually, the detection of fresh and rotten fruits is done manually which is an ineffective and lengthy process for farmers. For this reason, the development of a new classification model is required which will reduce human effort, cost, and production time in the agriculture industry by recognizing defects in the fruits. This article offers a major dataset to the researchers to develop effective algorithms for recognizing more variety of fruits and overcome the limitations by increasing accuracy as well as decreasing computation time. This dataset contains sixteen types of fruit classes, namely fresh grape, rotten grape, fresh guava, rotten guava, fresh jujube, rotten jujube, fresh pomegranate, rotten pomegranate, fresh strawberry, rotten strawberry, fresh apple, rotten apple, fresh banana, rotten banana, fresh orange, rotten orange. We collected various fresh and rotten fruit images from 16th to 31st March 2022 from different fruit shops and real fields with the help of a domain specialist from an agricultural organization. The dataset is hosted by the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, and is freely available at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/bdd69gyhv8/1.

Indexed as

AgricultureComputer visionDeep learningFruit datasetImage classification

Identifiers

PMID36111284
PMCPMC9469664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.