ArticleDisease markers2022
Study on the Potential Mechanism of miR-22-5p in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abnormal expression of miR-22-5p in breast cancer patients and its correlation with 18 F-FDG PET/CT features and serum-related tumor markers.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Fish MicroRNA Responses to Thermal Stress: Insights and Implications for Aquaculture and Conservation Amid Global Warming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- A thematic analysis of prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic of circulating miRNA biomarkers in bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma.SAGE open medicine · 2025Review
- Review of the Different Outcomes Produced by Genetic Knock Out of the Long Non-coding microRNA-host-gene MIR22HGMicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2025Review
- Topology and Dynamics of Transcriptome (Dys)Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Hsa-miR-22-3p inhibits liver cancer cell EMT and cell migration/ invasion by indirectly regulating SPRY2.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ranks among one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. A better and comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of its malignant progression will be helpful for clinical treating NSCLC. Methods: The miRNA expression profiles and target gene profiles downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus and TargetScan databases were used to identify the key regulatory pattern in NSCLC by bioinformatic analysis. The regulation of miRNA to target mRNA was verified by luciferase reporter assay, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and Western blot. A series of the in vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted to examine the mechanism of the overexpression or knockdown of the miRNA and/or target gene. Results: In this study, miR-22-5p was remarkably downregulated in NSCLC than in normal lung cells. The in vitro experiments showed that it could substantially inhibit NSCLC cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) progression. The results of luciferase reporter assay, qRT-PCR, and Western blot revealed that TWIST2 was a direct target gene of miR-22-5p. The results of in vitro and in vivo feedback experiments further demonstrated that miR-22-5p relied on TWIST2-induced malignant progression to regulate NSCLC proliferation, metastasis, and EMT progression. Conclusions: This study revealed that miR-22-5p downregulation contributed to the malignant progression of NSCLC by targeting TWIST2. The findings highlight a potential novel pathway that could be therapeutically targeted in treating NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.