Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111194›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Workplace violence against doctors in China: A case analysis of the Civil Aviation General Hospital incident.

Yu Xiao, Na Du, Jia Chen, Ya-Lan Li, Qin-Ming Qiu, Shao-Yi Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yu XiaoPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Na DuPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Jia ChenPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Ya-Lan LiPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Qin-Ming QiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Huzhou Third People's Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Shao-Yi ZhuDepartment of Psychiatry, Shantou University Mental Health Center, Shantou, China.
Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital · CNShantou University Mental Health Center · CNThird People's Hospital of Huzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Violence against health professionals is a global public health problem. In 2019, a doctor was killed in Civil Aviation General Hospital (CAGH), which triggered national discussion about hospital violence. Sina Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter, played an important role in this public discussion. The CAGH incident provides us with an opportunity to explore how social media was used in the discussion on violence against doctors. Methods: Using the built-in search engine of Sina Weibo, a data set containing 542 Chinese micro-blogs was established. Three keywords: Civil Aviation General Hospital, doctor, and knife were used to search for related posts between December 24th, 2019 and January 19th, 2020. We made a content analysis of the posts to investigate: Weibo users' demographics, views about the incident of CAGH, and measures to prevent hospital violence. Results: Overall, 89.3% of the posts were sent by individual Weibo users, and 10.7% by organizations. Among the individual users, doctors accounted for 27.4%, but only 1.0% came from the legal profession. In addition, 86.7% of the micro-blogs expressed sympathy for the attacked doctor, and 23.1% of the micro-blogs thought that the imperfect medical system was the main cause of the accident. Nearly half of the posts described their disappointment with the government and the society, and 58.6% of medical staff users expressed regret for engaging in medical work. Only 14.2% of micro-blogs put forward some constructive strategies to prevent hospital violence. Conclusion: Weibo users played an important role in spreading and discussing the CAGH incident. However, constructive measures to protect doctors were rarely mentioned, and legal opinions were not reflected in time. Hospital violence has caused public dissatisfaction with the government and weakened the professional confidence of medical staff. Occupational health and public health stakeholders must take effective measures to solve workplace violence against doctors.

Indexed as

AviationPhysiciansWorkplace ViolenceChinaHospitals, GeneralHumansdoctorhospital violenceoccupational safetysocial mediaworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID36111194
PMCPMC9468869
OpenAlexW4293554945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.