ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Anatomic feasibility of a modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method for impacted mandibular third molar extraction using cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various injection methods have been used to improve the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block and reduce the pain and complications. But these methods also have their advantages and disadvantages. A modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method proposed in 2015 was used clinically with satisfactory results at some dental clinics in China. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of this modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method for extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar from an anatomical point of view. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and analysis of the mandibles was performed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning to measure the simulated needle insertion depth, infiltration distance, and other important parameters. These parameters were compared with an actual depth of 20 mm and a theoretic infiltration distance of 10 mm. The main parameters were compared between males and females. Results: Sixty-three CBCT datasets were imported into Simplant OMS software for 3D reconstruction. The left simulated insertion depth did not differ from 20 mm, while right insertion depth was >20 mm (P<0.05). The bilateral infiltration distances were <10 mm (P<0.05) and articaine blocked the IAN. The widths of the mandibular rami were greater than the syringe length (21 mm), thus it was not possible for the syringe to reach the distal edge of the mandible. There was no difference in the simulated needle insertion depth and infiltration distance between the left and right (P>0.05). The bilateral simulated insertion depths, infiltration distances, widths of the mandibular rami, and height of the left mandibular foramen in females were less than in males (P<0.05), while there was no difference in the height of the right mandibular foramen and bilateral insertion angles (P>0.05). Conclusions: The modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method was shown to block the IAN based on anatomic evidence derived from 3D analysis on the measurements by CBCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.