Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36111009›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Establishment and verification of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with triple-positive breast cancer.

Xingguang Wang, Huxia Wang, Fende Liu, Lu Jie, Zhangjun Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingguang WangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Huxia WangDepartment of Breast Disease Center, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Fende LiuDepartment of Breast Disease Center, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Lu JieDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Zhangjun SongDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) is a specific type of breast cancer characterized by the positive expression of estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2). In recent years, the research on breast cancer has been increasing year by year, but there are few studies on TPBC, especially the lack of analysis with large sample size. In this study, sufficient samples were provided through the SEER database, explore the factors affecting the prognosis of TPBC, and construct a prediction model, in order to assess the individual survival of patients, and help clinicians accurately identify high-risk patients and develop personalized treatment plans. Methods: Patients pathologically diagnosed with TPBC were recruited from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into training and validation groups (7:3 ratio). Univariate analysis was used to analyze the related factors affecting the prognosis of TPBC patients in the modeling group, and then multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the significant factors to screen out the independent risk factors affecting the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and construct the prediction model. Using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve were performed to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. Results: The results of the Cox risk-scale model showed that race, age, marital status, tumor grade, tumor, node, metastasis stage, surgical treatment, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy affected the prognosis of TPBC patients (P<0.05) in the training group, and the factors were used to construct a nomogram. The internal and external validation of the nomogram chart indicated that the C-index of the training group was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.836, 0.863] and that of the verification group was 0.833 (95% CI: 0.807, 0.858). The calibration curves of the 2 groups showed that the OS predicted by the model was consistent with the actual survival of the patients. Conclusions: The prediction model accurately predicted the prognosis of and identified high-risk TPBC patients.

Indexed as

Epidemiology and End Result database (SEER database)prediction modelprognostic factorsSurveillanceTriple-positive breast cancer (TPBC)

Identifiers

PMID36111009
PMCPMC9469148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.