ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Machine-Learning-Based Human Fall Detection Using Contact- and Noncontact-Based Sensors.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gesture-Based Physical Stability Classification and Rehabilitation System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Machine-Learning-Blockchain-Based Authentication Using Smart Contracts for an IoHT System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Fall Risk in Multiple Sclerosis by Gait Analysis-An Innovative Approach Using Feature Selection Ensemble and Machine Learning Algorithms.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated human fall detection is an essential area of research due to its health implications in day-to-day life. Detecting and timely reporting of human falls may lead to saving human life. In this paper, fall detection has been targeted using machine-learning-based approaches from two perspectives regarding data sources, that is, contact-based and noncontact-based sensors. In both of these cases, various methods based on deep learning and machine learning techniques have been attempted, and their performances were compared. The approaches analyze data in fixed time windows and extract features in the time domain or spatial domain which obtain relative information between consecutive data samples. After experimentation, it was found that the proposed noncontact-based sensor techniques outperformed the contact-based sensor techniques by a margin of 1.82%. After this, it was also found that the noncontact-based sensor techniques outperformed the state of the art of noncontact-based sensor results by a margin of 3.15%. To better suit these techniques for real-world applications, embedded board implementation and privacy preservation of subject by using advanced methods such as compressive sensing and feature encoding need to be attempted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.