Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110908›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Machine-Learning-Based Human Fall Detection Using Contact- and Noncontact-Based Sensors.

Ayush Chandak, Nitin Chaturvedi, Dhiraj

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayush ChandakBITS Pilani, Pilani Campus, Pilani, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-4239
Nitin ChaturvediBITS Pilani, Pilani Campus, Pilani, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-5459
DhirajCSIR-CEERI, Pilani, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-8368
Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute · INBirla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated human fall detection is an essential area of research due to its health implications in day-to-day life. Detecting and timely reporting of human falls may lead to saving human life. In this paper, fall detection has been targeted using machine-learning-based approaches from two perspectives regarding data sources, that is, contact-based and noncontact-based sensors. In both of these cases, various methods based on deep learning and machine learning techniques have been attempted, and their performances were compared. The approaches analyze data in fixed time windows and extract features in the time domain or spatial domain which obtain relative information between consecutive data samples. After experimentation, it was found that the proposed noncontact-based sensor techniques outperformed the contact-based sensor techniques by a margin of 1.82%. After this, it was also found that the noncontact-based sensor techniques outperformed the state of the art of noncontact-based sensor results by a margin of 3.15%. To better suit these techniques for real-world applications, embedded board implementation and privacy preservation of subject by using advanced methods such as compressive sensing and feature encoding need to be attempted.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsData CompressionHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36110908
PMCPMC9470335
OpenAlexW4296038371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.