Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110791›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2022

Comparative Evaluation of Novel Bulk Fill Resin Composites with Conventional Composites for Microleakage Formation - A Steromicroscopic Study.

Jyoti Warad, A Manish, Altamash Khan Airani, Pavan Kumar Pavagada Sreenivasalu, Sangeeta Kulkarni, R Ambika Kumari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jyoti WaradDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
A ManishPrivate Practitioner, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Altamash Khan AiraniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Pavan Kumar Pavagada SreenivasaluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sangeeta KulkarniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, H.K.E.'S.S. Nijalingappa Institute Dental Sciences and Research, Kalburgi, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.
R Ambika KumariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare microleakage of two novel bulk-fill resin composites with traditional incremental composites. Materials and Methods: Standardized conservative Class II cavities were made on 120 sound maxillary premolars having approximately 4 mm of width with 2 mm gingival extension below CEJ keeping all line angles round and cavosurface margins beveled. Samples were categorized into the group of three (n = 40), based on composites used; Smart Dentine Replacement (SDR), X Tra Fill, and Z350 XT. The prepared cavities were filled with respective composites to a depth of 4 mm. Post thermocycling, Specimens were absorbed in 0.5% methylene blue for 8 h and soaked in tap water for 12 h samples were later split in mesiodistal direction at the center of the composite restorations with diamond disc. A total of 240 samples were obtained. The samples were viewed with ×20. One-way ANOVA and Results: SDR demonstrated considerably less micro leakage in comparison with X-Tra fill composites. Significantly high microleakage was observed in the traditional composites (Z350 XT). Conclusion: Novel Bulk-fill resin composites exhibited better adaptability and less microleakage compared to traditional multilayer composites.

Indexed as

Microleakagenovel compositesthermocyclingtraditional composites

Identifiers

PMID36110791
PMCPMC9469398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.