Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110645›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2022

Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer.

Syed Mueen Ahmed, Kranti Sorte Gawali, Princy Paul, Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail, Arwa Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Mohammed Abdullah Alkhelaiwi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Syed Mueen AhmedMClin Dent, Restorative and Cosmetic Dentistry (UK), Doha, Qatar.
Kranti Sorte GawaliDepartment of Biochemistry, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Princy PaulProfessor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, KMCT Dental College, Manassery, Mukkam, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Prabu Mahin Syed IsmailDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Al Rass Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Arwa Abdullah AlkhelaiwiCollege of Dentistry, Qassim University, Al Qassim Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Abdullah AlkhelaiwiCollege of Dentistry, Qassim University, Al Qassim Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study is to evaluate apical sealing ability of GuttaFlow Bioseal, Super-Bond RC Sealer, and Adseal root canal sealer. Material and Methods: 36 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, divided into three groups ( Results: The dye penetration in Group II was more than in Groups I and III in both vertical and horizontal directions, suggesting that GuttaFlow Bioseal and Adseal sealer are effective in reducing the apical leakage compared to Super-Bond RC Sealer. Conclusion: Bioceramic GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealers seal are better root canal sealer but they cannot totally eliminate apical leakage.

Indexed as

Bioceramicroot canalsealantssealing ability

Identifiers

PMID36110645
PMCPMC9469298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.