ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2022
An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Cortical Block Allograft Tenting Pins for Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Case Series.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: These days, patients want quick results for tooth replacement and esthetic results. However, there is no direct correlation between the achievement of osseointegration and the outcome of successful treatment always. It is vital to sustaining peri-implant soft tissue health for extensive tenure success of the implant. Aim: The purpose of this trial was to determine, estimate, and compare the soft tissue retort and esthetics of the titanium implants with titanium collar at periodic intervals by flapless and conventional flap technique before and after prosthesis placement. Results: The difference in soft tissue indices namely, gingival index, plaque index, and the modified sulcular bleeding index was insignificant between the two implants placed by flapless and open flap technique 2. There was a significant difference amid the probing depths of the two implants after 3 months of prosthesis positioning where the implant placed by flapless technique showed lesser values as compared to the implant placed by the open flap technique 3. The esthetics of the soft tissues surrounding the titanium implant with titanium collar, when compared, presented a significant difference between the two techniques of implant placement. Conclusion: In conclusion, in recent advancements in dentistry, the flapless technique is becoming prominent because of procedure of minimally invasive surgery in implantology. There are advantages of early re-epithelialization and less inflammation around the soft tissue of the implant in the flapless procedure, provided that the prospective for the establishment of a fully functioning along with aesthetically desirable peri-implant soft tissue collar. The flapless technique accomplishes high degrees of gratification by the patients by shortening the surgery time and minimum invasion to both bone and soft tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.