ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Efficacy Analysis of Comprehensive Nursing in the Care of Ovarian Carcinoma Treated with Paclitaxel Combined with Nedaplatin.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Efficacy Analysis of Comprehensive Nursing in the Care of Ovarian Carcinoma Treated with Paclitaxel Combined with Nedaplatin.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-13Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of comprehensive nursing in the care of ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients treated with paclitaxel (PTX) plus nedaplatin (NDP). Methods: The research population comprised 180 advanced OC patients who received treatment in the Shaanxi Cancer Hospital between November 2018 and November 2021. The enrolled cases were assigned to two groups based on different nursing plans: an observation group (OG) with 100 cases treated with comprehensive nursing and a control group (CG) with 80 cases intervened by conventional nursing. Intergroup comparisons were performed to identify statistical significance in terms of the following parameters: serum NGF, TK1, and CA15-3 levels; VAS, SAS, and SDS scores; nursing compliance; incidence of adverse reactions; and nursing satisfaction. Results: Compared with CG, OG showed the following: (1) lower posttreatment NGF, TK1, and CA15-3 levels; (2) lower scores of SAS and SDS; (3) higher nursing compliance; and (4) lower incidence of adverse reactions and higher nursing satisfaction after nursing. Conclusions: Comprehensive nursing far outperformed conventional nursing in the care of advanced OC patients treated with PTX plus NDP, which is worth popularizing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.