Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110490›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Comparison of Gastric Insufflation Volume Between Ambu AuraGain and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Using Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Adethen Gunasekaran, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Suman Lata Gupta, Stalin Vinayagam, Sandeep Kumar Mishra

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06426394 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of End-expiratory Positive Pressure on Gastric Residual Volume in Elective Pediatric Outpatient Surgery Where Laryngeal Mask is Applied

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDuygu AkyolRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsPediatrics, Fasting Period
NCT07138092 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Gastric Insufflation Volume by Ultrasound Using I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Patients Undergoing Urological Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsNausea and Vomiting, Postoperative, Sore-throatArmsi jel LMA, proseal LMA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adethen GunasekaranAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, IND.
Kirthiha GovindarajAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, IND.
Suman Lata GuptaAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, IND.
Stalin VinayagamAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, IND.
Sandeep Kumar MishraAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmbu AuraGain and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway are second-generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with added advantage of gastric drain and better oropharyngeal sealing pressure. The primary objective was to study the difference in the gastric insufflation volume between Ambu AuraGain and ProSeal LMA in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial involving 120 adult patients scheduled under general anesthesia were randomized into either Ambu AuraGain or LMA ProSeal group. Gastric cross-sectional area was measured using ultrasonography at baseline, after mask ventilation, and at the end of surgery. Gastric volume was calculated from the measured cross-sectional area. Oropharyngeal sealing pressure, peak airway pressure, and postoperative complications were noted. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsDemographic profile of the study groups was comparable. There was a significant difference in gastric volume between the groups at the end of surgery with 5.91 ml (±9.68 ml) in Ambu AuraGain group and 12.28 ml (±13.05 ml) in the LMA ProSeal group (p = 0.001). Similarly, there was a difference in volume between baseline and at the end of the surgery within the groups also (Ambu AuraGain group, p=0.0012; LMA ProSeal group, p=0.0015, respectively). Though the oropharyngeal sealing pressure and peak airway pressures were comparable, increased incidence of postoperative complications was observed with LMA ProSeal.

conclusionThus, Ambu AuraGain resulted in a lower gastric insufflation volume than LMA ProSeal with lesser incidence of postoperative complications.

Indexed as

aspiration pneumoniagastric antrumgeneral anaesthesiaintubationpositive pressure ventilationultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36110490
PMCPMC9464011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.