Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110481›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Saudi Hospitals Compliance With the Baby-Friendly Hospitals Initiative Evaluation Study.

Khaled Alghamdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khaled AlghamdiPediatrics, Taibah University, Medina, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction National surveys from Saudi Arabia have shown that the breastfeeding rate in Saudi Arabia is lagging behind the global recommendations. The UNICEF and WHO have launched the 10-step Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) for encouraging healthcare facilities across the world to support breastfeeding in a better way. In this study, we validated the Arabic version of the self-appraisal and monitoring tool based on the BFHI as well as assessed the determinants of breastfeeding practice in Saudi Arabia. Methods This was an analytical cross-sectional study. We used the free validated tool-Questionnaire for Breastfeeding Mother based on the BFHI Session 4.2 Guidelines. The tool was translated and validated in Arabic. A nonprobability sample included mothers of children based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) mothers living in Saudi Arabia; 2) mothers of children aged 0-12 months. The Arabic version was modified into six parts, and the questionnaire was left open for respondents for a period of six months. Descriptive statistics were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results The sample size was 584, and during prenatal visits, 23.6% of mothers were provided with information about skin-to-skin contact immediately after childbirth. Of these, 40% started breastfeeding immediately and 43% were encouraged to breastfeed postnatally. On discharge, 34.6% of mothers received help for feeding-related issues. Conclusion Our hospitals are well set to adopt the BFHI in terms of policy making and coordinated postnatal care. However, prenatal care should be more focused on promoting breastfeeding. Massive and coordinated quality improvement steps are highly indicated to completely implement the initiative.

Indexed as

baby-friendly hospitalsbreastfeedinginitiativemotherspostnatal careprenatal careunicefwho guideline

Identifiers

PMID36110481
PMCPMC9464353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.