Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110424›Full record

ReviewBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2022

Towards early and broad evaluation of innovative surgical devices: integrating evidence synthesis, stakeholder involvement, and health economic modeling into the clinical research stages of the IDEAL framework.

Mirre Scholte, Kas Woudstra, Janneke P C Grutters, Gerjon Hannink, Marcia Tummers, Rob P B Reuzel, Maroeska M Rovers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mirre Scholte *Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3102-6011
Kas Woudstra *Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Janneke P C GruttersOperating Rooms and Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Gerjon HanninkOperating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9526-3775
Marcia TummersHealth Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rob P B ReuzelHealth Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maroeska M RoversOperating Rooms and Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3095-170X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Device EvaluationDevicesHealth TechnologyMethodologyTechnology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID36110424
PMCPMC9442474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.