Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Prognostic significance of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Yunling Li, Guokun Wang, Xueying Wang, Ye Li, Yanming Zhao, Xia Gu, Bing Xu, Jinjin Cui, Xuedong Wang, Yong Sun and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yunling LiDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Guokun WangDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xueying WangDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ye LiDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yanming ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xia GuDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Bing XuDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jinjin CuiThe Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xuedong WangThe Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yong SunThe Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Shengliang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Bo YuThe Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Myocardial salvage index (MSI) is attracting increasing attention for predicting prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI); however, the evaluation of MSI is mainly based on contrast agent-dependent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scanning sequences. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of MSI in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) through the contrast agent-free CMR technique. Methods and results: Nighty-two patients with acute STEMI, who underwent CMR after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), were finally enrolled. Patients were subcategorized into two groups according to median MSI. T1 and T2 mapping were conducted for measuring infarct size (IS) and area at risk (AAR). IS was significantly larger in < median MSI group than ≥ median MSI group ( Conclusion: Contrast agent-free CMR technique provides a reliable evaluation of MSI, which contributes to assessing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy and predicting the occurrence of MACEs.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionarea at riskcardiac magnetic resonanceinfarct sizemyocardial salvage index

Identifiers

PMID36110410
PMCPMC9468362
OpenAlexW4293537795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.