Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110394›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Structural magnetic resonance imaging findings and histopathological correlations in motor neuron diseases-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Charlotte Zejlon, Dominik Nakhostin, Sebastian Winklhofer, Athina Pangalu, Zsolt Kulcsar, Sebastian Lewandowski, Johannes Finnsson, Fredrik Piehl, Caroline Ingre, Tobias Granberg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Case report: p.Glu134delFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte ZejlonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dominik NakhostinDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Sebastian WinklhoferDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Athina PangaluDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Zsolt KulcsarDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Sebastian LewandowskiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johannes FinnssonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik PiehlDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Caroline IngreDepartment of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias GranbergDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Benjamin Victor IneichenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHKarolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm Health Care Services · SEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The lack of systematic evidence on neuroimaging findings in motor neuron diseases (MND) hampers the diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, we aimed at performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI features in MND including their histopathological correlation. Methods: In a comprehensive literature search, out of 5941 unique publications, 223 records assessing brain and spinal cord MRI findings in MND were eligible for a qualitative synthesis. 21 records were included in a random effect model meta-analysis. Results: Our meta-analysis shows that both T2-hyperintensities along the corticospinal tracts (CST) and motor cortex T2 Conclusions: Although CST T2-hyperintensities and the "motor band sign" are non-specific imaging features, they can be leveraged for diagnostic workup of suspected MND cases, together with certain brain atrophy patterns. Collectively, this study provides high-grade evidence for the usefulness of MRI in the diagnostic workup of suspected MND cases. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42020182682.

Indexed as

amyotrophic lateral sclerosismagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)meta-analysismotor neuron diseaseneuroimagingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36110394
PMCPMC9468579
OpenAlexW4293661478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.