ArticleHealth science reports2022
Follow-up the severity of abnormalities diagnosed in chest CT imaging of COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follow-up the severity of abnormalities diagnosed in chest CT imaging of COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the severity of diagnosed lung abnormalities of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients based on the pre-and postrecovery follow-up chest computed tomography (CT) scan findings done at regular intervals. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in three phases. The severity of lung abnormalities was recorded and compared based on the initial and follow-up chest CT findings carried out pre-and at regular intervals (3 and 6 months) of postrecovery of COVID-19 patients. Statistical data analysis was conducted using SPSS-Version 26. Pearson Chi-square test was used to analyze the results. Results: Regarding the initial chest CT findings, although ground-glass opacity (GGO) was observed as the most common lung lesion, almost all the evaluated COVID-19 patients had multiple lung lesions and involvements, especially with more involvement of the lower lobes. concerning the frequency of lung lesions and involvements in all phases of the study, almost no statistically significant differences were observed between male and female COVID-19 patients and different age groups. However, older age groups had relatively more lung abnormalities due to Covid-19 based on initial CT images which take more time to be eliminated. Lung abnormalities of Covid-19 patients decreased significantly during the follow ups based on chest CT findings at different study phases. Conclusion: According to evaluated pre- and post-recovery chest CT scans, the frequency of lung lesions and lung involvement distribution decreased significantly in COVID-19 patients, 3 and 6 months after recovery, and most of the recovered patients had no lung lesions or involvement anymore.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.