Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110150›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Using ensembles and distillation to optimize the deployment of deep learning models for the classification of electronic cancer pathology reports.

Kevin De Angeli, Shang Gao, Andrew Blanchard, Eric B Durbin, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Antoinette Stroup, Jennifer Doherty, Stephen M Schwartz, Charles Wiggins, Linda Coyle and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The SEER Program's evolution: supporting clinically meaningful population-level research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kevin De AngeliOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-0528
Shang GaoOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Andrew BlanchardOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Eric B DurbinCollege of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-7645
Xiao-Cheng WuLouisiana Tumor Registry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Antoinette StroupRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jennifer DohertyUtah Cancer Registry, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Stephen M SchwartzFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Charles WigginsUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Linda CoyleInformation Management Services Inc., Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Lynne PenberthyNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Georgia TourassiOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Hong-Jun YoonOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800013CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800013INCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aim to reduce overfitting and model overconfidence by distilling the knowledge of an ensemble of deep learning models into a single model for the classification of cancer pathology reports. Materials and Methods: We consider the text classification problem that involves 5 individual tasks. The baseline model consists of a multitask convolutional neural network (MtCNN), and the implemented ensemble (teacher) consists of 1000 MtCNNs. We performed knowledge transfer by training a single model (student) with soft labels derived through the aggregation of ensemble predictions. We evaluate performance based on accuracy and abstention rates by using softmax thresholding. Results: The student model outperforms the baseline MtCNN in terms of abstention rates and accuracy, thereby allowing the model to be used with a larger volume of documents when deployed. The highest boost was observed for subsite and histology, for which the student model classified an additional 1.81% reports for subsite and 3.33% reports for histology. Discussion: Ensemble predictions provide a useful strategy for quantifying the uncertainty inherent in labeled data and thereby enable the construction of soft labels with estimated probabilities for multiple classes for a given document. Training models with the derived soft labels reduce model confidence in difficult-to-classify documents, thereby leading to a reduction in the number of highly confident wrong predictions. Conclusions: Ensemble model distillation is a simple tool to reduce model overconfidence in problems with extreme class imbalance and noisy datasets. These methods can facilitate the deployment of deep learning models in high-risk domains with low computational resources where minimizing inference time is required.

Indexed as

CNNdeep learningensemble distillationNLPselective classification

Identifiers

PMID36110150
PMCPMC9469924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.