Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110039›Full record

Trial reportAnaesthesia2022

Ease and comfort of pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial.

A F Merry, H van Waart, S J Allen, P A Baker, D Cumin, C M A Frampton, D A Gargiulo, J A Hannam, G F Keogh, M R Moore and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A F MerryDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7100-009X
H van WaartDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
S J AllenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand.
P A BakerDepartment of Anaesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand.
D CuminDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
C M A FramptonDepartment of Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand.
D A GargiuloDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
J A HannamDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
G F KeoghDepartment of Anaesthesia, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
M R MooreDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
M PaytonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
S J MitchellDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Difficult Airway Society recommends that all patients should be pre-oxygenated before the induction of general anaesthesia, but this may not always be easy or comfortable and anaesthesia may often be induced without full pre-oxygenation. We tested the hypothesis that high-flow nasal oxygen cannulae would be easier and more comfortable than facemasks for pre-oxygenation. We randomly allocated 199 patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥ 10 years to pre-oxygenation using either high-flow nasal oxygen or facemask. Ease and comfort were assessed by anaesthetists and patients on 10-cm visual analogue scale and six-point smiley face scale, respectively. Secondary endpoints included end-tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway and time to secure an airway. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in ratings of -0.76 (-1.25 to -0.27) cm for ease of use (p = 0.003) and -0.45 (-0.75 to -0.13) points for comfort (p = 0.006), both favoured high-flow nasal oxygen. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in end-tidal oxygen fraction of 3.89% (2.41-5.37%) after securing a definitive airway also favoured high-flow nasal oxygen (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients with hypoxaemia (S

Indexed as

MasksOxygenAdministration, IntranasalCannulaHumansHypoxiaOxygen Inhalation TherapyOxygenairway managementhigh-flow nasal oxygenationpre-oxygenationtransnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE)

Identifiers

PMID36110039
PMCPMC9826500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.