Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36110031›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition

Recall and recognition subtests of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status and their relationship to biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

Matthew J Euler, Kevin Duff, Jace B King, John M Hoffman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J EulerDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9741-049X
Kevin DuffCenter for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging, and Research, Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9336-2400
Jace B KingDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
John M HoffmanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Enriching clinical trials requiring amyloid positivity with practice effectsR01AG055428 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DUFF, KEVIN M, HOFFMAN, JOHN M · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma 3T MRI scannerS10OD018482 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKER, DENNIS L · 2015 to 2015
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055428NIH HHS S10 OD018482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, two new recognition subtests for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) were developed and initially validated in a cohort of older adults who were cognitively intact or classified as amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The current paper extends that validation by comparing the recall and recognition subtests of the RBANS, including the existing and recently developed scores, to three commonly used biomarkers in AD in an expanded sample from the initial validation. One hundred fifty-four older adults (65 intact, 46 MCI, 43 AD) were administered the RBANS, which included the recently developed subtests for Story Recognition and Figure Recognition (hits, false positives, total correct), as part of a study on memory and biomarkers. Participants also completed magnetic resonance imaging to obtain hippocampal volumes, positron emission tomography to obtain amyloid plaque deposition, and a blood draw to obtain APOE ε4 status. Whereas correlations between recall scores and biomarkers tended to be moderate (average r = ±0.48), these correlations were comparable across the three recognition total scores (average r = ±0.42), but tended to be lower for recognition hits (average r = ±0.28) and false positives (average r = ±0.38). These results further validate the existing and recently developed recognition scores on the RBANS as providing useful information about brain and genetic pathology in older adults with intact and impaired cognitive functioning.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedBiomarkersHumansMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkersneuropsychological assessmentRBANSrecognition memory

Identifiers

PMID36110031
PMCPMC10014490
OpenAlexW4296035486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.