Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109798›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2022

A novel molecular signature identifies mixed subtypes in renal cell carcinoma with poor prognosis and independent response to immunotherapy.

Florian A Büttner, Stefan Winter, Viktoria Stühler, Steffen Rausch, Jörg Hennenlotter, Susanne Füssel, Stefan Zastrow, Matthias Meinhardt, Marieta Toma, Carmen Jerónimo and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Promising Biomarkers and the Challenges to Reach the Clinic.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Florian A Büttner *Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Auerbachstrasse 112, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan Winter *Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Auerbachstrasse 112, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Viktoria StühlerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Steffen RauschDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jörg HennenlotterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Susanne FüsselDepartment of Urology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan ZastrowDepartment of Urology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Matthias MeinhardtInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marieta TomaInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Carmen JerónimoCancer Biology & Epigenetics Group-Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP, IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Rui HenriqueCancer Biology & Epigenetics Group-Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP, IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Vera Miranda-GonçalvesCancer Biology & Epigenetics Group-Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP, IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Nils KrögerDepartment of Urology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Silvia RibbackInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Abbas AgaimyInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Christine StöhrInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Iris PolifkaInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Falko FendInstitute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Marcus ScharpfInstitute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Eva ComperatDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriel WasingerDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Holger MochDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zuerich, University of Zuerich, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Arnulf StenzlDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Marco GerlingerTranslational cancer immunotherapy and genomics lab, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Jens Bedke *Department of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Matthias Schwab *Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Auerbachstrasse 112, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany. matthias.schwab@ikp-stuttgart.de.
Elke Schaeffeler *Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Auerbachstrasse 112, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
TU Dresden · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEIPO Porto · PTMedical University of Vienna · ATGerman Cancer Research Center · DEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease comprising histologically defined subtypes. For therapy selection, precise subtype identification and individualized prognosis are mandatory, but currently limited. Our aim was to refine subtyping and outcome prediction across main subtypes, assuming that a tumor is composed of molecular features present in distinct pathological subtypes.

methodsIndividual RCC samples were modeled as linear combination of the main subtypes (clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), chromophobe (chRCC)) using computational gene expression deconvolution. The new molecular subtyping was compared with histological classification of RCC using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 864; ccRCC: 512; pRCC: 287; chRCC: 65) as well as 92 independent histopathologically well-characterized RCC. Predicted continuous subtypes were correlated to cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the TCGA cohort and validated in 242 independent RCC. Association with treatment-related progression-free survival (PFS) was studied in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (n = 726) and IMmotion151 trials (n = 823). CSS and PFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

resultsOne hundred seventy-four signature genes enabled reference-free molecular classification of individual RCC. We unambiguously assign tumors to either ccRCC, pRCC, or chRCC and uncover molecularly heterogeneous tumors (e.g., with ccRCC and pRCC features), which are at risk of worse outcome. Assigned proportions of molecular subtype-features significantly correlated with CSS (ccRCC (P = 4.1E - 10), pRCC (P = 6.5E - 10), chRCC (P = 8.6E - 06)) in TCGA. Translation into a numerical RCC-R(isk) score enabled prognosis in TCGA (P = 9.5E - 11). Survival modeling based on the RCC-R score compared to pathological categories was significantly improved (P = 3.6E - 11). The RCC-R score was validated in univariate (P = 3.2E - 05; HR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.8-5.08) and multivariate analyses including clinicopathological factors (P = 0.018; HR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.14-4.04). Heterogeneous PD-L1-positive RCC determined by molecular subtyping showed increased PFS with checkpoint inhibition versus sunitinib in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (P = 3.3E - 04; HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36 - 0.75) and IMmotion151 trials (P = 0.047; HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48 - 1). The prediction of PFS significantly benefits from classification into heterogeneous and unambiguous subtypes in both cohorts (P = 0.013 and P = 0.032).

conclusionSwitching from categorical to continuous subtype classification across most frequent RCC subtypes enables outcome prediction and fosters personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmunotherapyPrognosisSunitinibB7-H1 AntigenSunitinibCancer-specific survivalGene expression deconvolutionImmunotherapyRCC subtypesRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36109798
PMCPMC9476269
OpenAlexW4295926874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.