Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109765›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Efficacy of bednets with dual insecticide-treated netting (Interceptor® G2) on side and roof panels against Anopheles arabiensis in north-eastern Tanzania.

Njelembo J Mbewe, Mark W Rowland, Janneke Snetselaar, Salum Azizi, Graham Small, Derric D Nimmo, Franklin W Mosha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Njelembo J Mbewe *Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. njelembo.mbewe@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mark W Rowland *Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Janneke SnetselaarInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Salum AziziKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium, Moshi, Tanzania.
Graham SmallInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Derric D NimmoInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Franklin W MoshaKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium, Moshi, Tanzania.
Innovative Vector Control Consortium · GBKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimising insecticide use and managing insecticide resistance are important to sustain gains against malaria using long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). Restricting insecticides to where mosquitoes are most likely to make multiple contacts could reduce the quantity of insecticide needed to treat the nets. Previous studies have shown that nets partially treated with a pyrethroid insecticide had equivalent mortality compared to a fully treated net. This study compared the efficacy of: (i) whole Interceptor® G2 nets (IG2; a dual-active LLIN containing alpha-cypermethrin and chlorfenapyr), (ii) nets with roof panels made of IG2 netting, (iii) nets with side panels made of IG2 netting and (iv) whole untreated nets as test nets.

methodsThe study was conducted in cow-baited experimental huts, Moshi Tanzania, using a four-arm Latin square design. Test nets had 30 holes cut in panels to simulate a typical net after 2-3 year use. The trial data were analysed using generalized linear models with mortality, blood-feeding, exophily and deterrence against wild free-flying Anopheles arabiensis as outcomes and test nets as predictors.

resultsMortality was significantly higher in the nets with roof IG2 [27%, P = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 51.0, 95% CI = 4.8-546.2), side IG2 (44%, P < 0.001, OR = 137.6, 95% CI = 12.2-1553.2] and whole IG2 (53%, P < 0.001, OR = 223.0, 95% CI = 19.07-2606.0) nettings than the untreated (1%) nets. Mortality was also significantly higher in the whole IG2 net compared to the net with roof IG2 netting (P = 0.009, OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.4-13.3). Blood feeding was 22% in untreated, 10% in roof IG2, 14% in side IG2 and 19% in whole IG2 nets. Exiting was 92% in untreated, 89% in roof IG2, 97% in side IG2 and 94% whole IG2 nets.

conclusionThe results show that although the roof-treated IG2 net induced greater mortality compared to untreated nets, its efficacy was reduced compared to whole IG2 nets. Therefore, there was no benefit to be gained from restricting dual-active ingredient IG2 netting to the roof of nets.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsPyrethrinsAnimalsCattleFemaleMacrolidesMosquito ControlTanzaniaInsecticidesMacrolidesmilbemycin oximePyrethrinsAlphacypermethrinAnopheles arabiensisChlorfenapyrInsecticide resistanceLong-lasting insecticidal netsPartially treated nets

Identifiers

PMID36109765
PMCPMC9479251
OpenAlexW4295925432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.