Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109756›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2022

Quality of care in abortion in the era of technological and medical advancements and self-care.

Ankita Shukla, Lucía Vazquez-Quesada, Isabel Vieitez, Rajib Acharya, Saumya RamaRao

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ankita ShuklaUniversity of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE. ankita17shukla@gamil.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-3406
Lucía Vazquez-QuesadaPopulation Council, Mexico City, Mexico.
Isabel VieitezPopulation Council, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rajib AcharyaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Saumya RamaRaoPopulation Council, New York, USA.
Population Council · USPopulation Council Institute · INUniversity of Sharjah · AE

Funding

David and Lucile Packard Foundation David and Lucile Packard Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscussions around quality of abortion care have been focused mainly on service-delivery aspects inside healthcare facilities. More recently, with availability of medical abortion (MA), increase in its self-use, and emergence of other delivery platforms such as telemedicine, the responsibility of quality care has broadened to actors outside of facilities. BODY OF TEXT: This commentary discusses the meaning of quality of abortion care with the paradigm shift brought by medical and technological advancement in abortions, and raises questions on the role of the state in ensuring quality in abortion management-especially in settings where abortion is decriminalized, but also in countries where abortion is permitted under certain circumstances. It consolidates the experience gained thus far in the provision of safe abortion services and also serves as a forward-thinking tool to keep pace with the uptake of newer health technologies (e.g., availability of medical abortion drugs), service delivery platforms (e.g., telemedicine, online pharmacies), and abortion care providers (e.g., community based pharmacists).

conclusionsThis commentary provides context and rationale, and identifies areas for action that different stakeholders, including health advocates, policymakers, program managers, and women themselves, can adopt to fit into an alternative regime of abortion care.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedSelf CareFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansPregnancyQuality of Health CareAbortionAbortion self-managementMedical abortionMisoprostolPharmacistsQuality of careTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36109756
PMCPMC9479303
OpenAlexW4296035332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.