Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109526›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Inhibition of UBA6 by inosine augments tumour immunogenicity and responses.

Lei Zhang, Li Jiang, Liang Yu, Qin Li, Xiangjun Tian, Jingquan He, Ling Zeng, Yuqin Yang, Chaoran Wang, Yuhan Wei and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Lei Zhang *Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Li Jiang *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Liang Yu *Department of Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Qin Li *Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Xiangjun TianDepartment of Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jingquan HeBiotree Institute of Health, Shanghai, 201800, China.
Ling ZengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Yuqin YangDepartment of Laboratory Animal Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Chaoran WangDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Yuhan WeiDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Xiaoyue JiangDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, China.
Xiaolu GeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Qisheng GuDepartment of Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7294-042X
Jikun LiDepartment of Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Di WuDepartment of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7455, USA.
Anthony J SadlerHudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Di YuDiamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-8922
Dakang XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yue GaoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 100850, China. gaoyue@bmi.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1131-5326
Xiangliang YuanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. yuanxiangliang@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2779-5750
Baokun HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China. baokun.he@shgh.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4019-4922
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNCapital Medical University · CNQingdao University · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNHealth Biomed (China) · CNHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUNational Institutes of Pharmaceutical Research and Development (China) · CNThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-cancer immunity and response to immune therapy is influenced by the metabolic states of the tumours. Immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICB) is known to involve metabolic adaptation, however, the mechanism is not fully known. Here we show, by metabolic profiling of plasma samples from melanoma-bearing mice undergoing anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination therapy, that higher levels of purine metabolites, including inosine, mark ICB sensitivity. Metabolic profiles of ICB-treated human cancers confirm the association between inosine levels and ICB sensitivity. In mouse models, inosine supplementation sensitizes tumours to ICB, even if they are intrinsically ICB resistant, by enhancing T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and hence generating an immunologically hotter microenvironment. We find that inosine directly inhibits UBA6 in tumour cells, and lower level of UBA6 makes the tumour more immunogenic and this is reflected in favourable outcome following ICB therapy in human melanomas. Transplanted mouse melanoma and breast cancer cells with genetic ablation of Uba6 show higher sensitivity to ICB than wild type tumours. Thus, we provide evidence of an inosine-regulated UBA6-dependent pathway governing tumour-intrinsic immunogenicity and hence sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibition, which might provide targets to overcome ICB resistance.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyHumansInosineMiceRadioimmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentUbiquitin-Activating EnzymesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsInosineUBA6 protein, humanUbiquitin-Activating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID36109526
PMCPMC9478149
OpenAlexW4296038319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.