Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109474›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Challenges and opportunities of smallholder pig production systems in Rwanda.

Claire d'Andre Hirwa, Jules Mutabazi, Jean De Dieu Nsabimana, Leonidas Dusengemungu, Aline Kayitesi, Fabrice Semahoro, Gaspard Uwimana, Pascal Nyabinwa, Donald Rugira Kugonza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire d'Andre HirwaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Monogastric Program, RAB, P.O. Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda. claredandre07@gmail.com.
Jules MutabaziRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Monogastric Program, RAB, P.O. Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Jean De Dieu NsabimanaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Socio-Economics Program, P.O.Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Leonidas DusengemunguRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Socio-Economics Program, P.O.Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Aline KayitesiRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Monogastric Program, RAB, P.O. Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Fabrice SemahoroRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Monogastric Program, RAB, P.O. Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Gaspard UwimanaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Monogastric Program, RAB, P.O. Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Pascal NyabinwaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Monogastric Program, RAB, P.O. Box 5016, Rubona, Rwanda.
Donald Rugira KugonzaDepartment of Agricultural Production (DAP), School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS), College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences (CAES), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To decipher the dynamics, challenges, and opportunities of smallholder pig farming in Rwanda, a household survey was conducted in ten districts of the country. A total of 900 households selected randomly across four provinces and one city, 12 districts, 28 sectors, and villages were interviewed using a pretested printed questionnaire. Most of the respondents were heads of household: 70.9% for western, 63.5% in eastern, 54.1% in northern, and 52.5% in southern province, and their mean age was 46.7 years and had widely varying education levels. Crossbred pig genotypes were the most preferred due to their high growth rate and produce large litters compared to local pigs, as well as their high resistance to disease, and can better utilize low-quality feeds compared to pure exotic pigs. Piglets and sows were the biggest populations on most farms. Production of piglets for sale was the main purpose of rearing pigs in 63.7% of the farms. Natural mating was almost (99.1%) exclusive on all farms, implying that artificial insemination is yet to take root in Rwanda. Weeds were reported to be the main feed resource used particularly in wet season, while cereal grain mashes and concentrates were used by very few farmers due to high costs. Dominant challenges related to limited pig and pork markets, high taxation, limited extension services, and disease outbreak were highlighted. The most common diseases affecting pigs were swine erysipelas and internal parasites. Access to veterinary services by the households was limited especially in northern province (20%) leading to wrong diagnosis. Capacity building and provision of access to quality animal health services as well as setting up of markets were proposed as strategies to improve pig production by smallholders in Rwanda and grab a share of the lucrative pork market in the region.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryReproductionAnimalsCommerceRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesSwineMarket orientedNatural matingPig production

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.