Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109420›Full record

Trial reportMaternal and child health journal2022

Experiences of Native Participants in the Promoting First Relationships® Intervention: Focus Group Findings.

Rae O'Leary, Monica L Oxford, Cathryn Booth-LaForce, Sara London, Dedra S Buchwald

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy ofJournal of family studies · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rae O'LearyMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Inc., 118 S. Willow Street, PO Box 1824, Eagle Butte, SD, 57625, USA. rae.oleary@mbiri.com.
Monica L OxfordChild, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Cathryn Booth-LaForceChild, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9630-9250
Sara LondonCollege of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Dedra S BuchwaldInstitute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Seattle and Spokane, USA.
University of Washington · USMissouri Breaks Industries Research (United States) · USWashington State University Spokane · US

Funding

A Primary Prevention Trial to Strengthen Child Attachment in a Native CommunityR01NR014153 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOOTH-LAFORCE, CATHRYN, OXFORD, MONICA L · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
NINR NIH HHS NR014153NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe tested Promoting First Relationships® (PFR), an evidence-based preventive intervention program for caregivers promoting attachment and social and emotional development of infants and toddlers, in a randomized controlled trial in a Native community. Quantitative results yielded evidence of efficacy; but in this report, our objective was to assess the participants' real-life experiences, challenges, and suggested enhancements to further adapt the program.

methodsAt the end of the study we conducted three focus groups (N = 17)-two groups for participants who completed the 10-week intervention and one group for those who did not. Focus groups were structured to generate discussion about (1) elements or activities of PFR they enjoyed and others that were challenging, (2) suggested solutions to participant challenges, (3) experiences with video recordings and handouts, and (4) aspects of the program that could be changed to make it more culturally-relevant.

resultsQualitative analysis of the focus group transcripts revealed five themes: (1) appreciation for PFR providers and program, (2) personal growth, (3) improved caregiver-child relationships, (4) participant challenges, and (5) participant suggestions to improve the program.

conclusionsThese qualitative results complement our quantitative assessment of the positive impact of the PFR program. Additionally, they provide importance guidance for future implementation of PFR in this, and other Native communities, as well as insight into broader issues to consider when adapting intervention programs for Native families.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyFocus GroupsHumansInfantAmerican IndianCaregiver-Child RelationshipHome VisitingInterventionNative AmericanPrevention

Identifiers

PMID36109420
PMCPMC10693919
OpenAlexW4295932266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.