Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109316›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2022

Prediction of proton beam range in phantom with metals based on monochromatic energy CT images.

Qianqian Meng, Jing Li, Wei Jiang, Birong Hu, Feng Xu, Xiaomeng Shi, Renming Zhong

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Qianqian MengRadiophysical Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jing LiRadiophysical Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, 264000, China.
Birong HuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610021, China.
Feng XuLung Cancer Center & Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xiaomeng ShiCT Imaging Research Center, GE Healthcare China, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Renming ZhongRadiophysical Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNAcademy of Opto-Electronics · CNChengdu Second People's Hospital · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province, China 2021YFQ0065West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2021HXFH029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of monochromatic energy (MonoE) computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed by spectral CT in predicting the stopping power ratio $( SP{R}_w)$ of materials in the presence of metal. The CIRS062 phantom was scanned three times using spectral CT. In the first scan, a solid water insert was placed at the center of the phantom $(C{T}_{no\ metal})$. In the second scan, the solid water insert was replaced with a titanium alloy femoral head $(C{T}_{metal})$. The metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm was used in the last scan $(C{T}_{metal+ MAR})$. The MonoE-CT images of 40 keV and 80 keV were reconstructed. Finally, the single-energy CT method (SECT) and the dual-energy CT method (DECT) were used to calculate the $SP{R}_w$. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the $SP{R}_w$ of the inner layer inserts calculated by the SECT method were 3.19%, 13.88% and 2.71%, corresponding to $C{T}_{no\ metal}$, $C{T}_{metal}$ and $C{T}_{metal+ MAR}$, respectively. For the outer layer inserts, the MAE of $SP{R}_w$ were 3.43%, 5.42% and 2.99%, respectively. Using the DECT method, the MAE of the $SP{R}_w$ of the inner layer inserts was 1.30%, 3.69% and 1.46% and the MAE of the outer layer inserts- was 1.34%, 1.36% and 1.05%. The studies shows that, compared with the SECT method, the accuracy of the DECT method in predicting the $SP{R}_w$ of a material is more robust to the presence of metal. Using the MAR algorithm when performing CT scans can further improve the accuracy of predicting the SPR of materials in the presence of metal.

Indexed as

ProtonsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWaterProtonsWaterdual-energy computed tomography (DECT)metal artifact reduction (MAR)metal artifactsproton range

Identifiers

PMID36109316
PMCPMC9726739
OpenAlexW4295911166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.