Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109179›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Patient-specific radiological protection precautions following Cs collagen embedded Cs-131 implantation in the brain.

Kavya Prasad, Lawrence T Dauer, Bae P Chu, David Aramburu-Nunez, Gilad Cohen, Kathryn Beal, Brandon S Imber, Nelson S Moss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kavya PrasadDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lawrence T DauerDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Bae P ChuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
David Aramburu-NunezDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Gilad CohenDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kathryn BealDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Brandon S ImberDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nelson S MossDepartment of Neurological Surgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCesium-131 brachytherapy is an adjunct for brain tumor treatment, offering potential clinical and radiation protection advantages over other isotopes including iodine-125. We present evidence-based radiation safety recommendations from an initial experience with Cs-131 brachytherapy in the resection cavities of recurrent, previously irradiated brain metastases.

methodsTwenty-two recurrent brain metastases in 18 patients were resected and treated with permanent Cs-131 brachytherapy implantation using commercially procured seed-impregnated collagen tiles (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies). Exposure to intraoperative staff was monitored with NVLAP-accredited ring dosimeters. For patient release considerations, NCRP guidelines were used to develop an algorithm for modeling lifetime exposure to family and ancillary staff caring for patients based on measured dose rates.

resultsA median of 16 Cs-131 seeds were implanted (range 6-46) with median cumulative strength of 58.72U (20.64-150.42). Resulting dose rates were 1.19 mSv/h (0.28-3.3) on contact, 0.08 mSv/h (0.01-0.35) at 30 cm, and 0.01 mSv/h (0.001-0.03) at 100 cm from the patient. Modeled total caregiver exposure was 0.91 mSv (0.16-3.26), and occupational exposure was 0.06 mSv (0.02-0.23) accounting for patient self-shielding via skull and soft tissue attenuation. Real-time dose rate measurements were grouped into brackets to provide close contact precautions for caregivers ranging from 1-3 weeks for adults and longer for pregnant women and children, including cases with multiple implantations.

conclusionsRadiological protection precautions were developed based on patient-specific emissions and accounted for multiple implantations of Cs-131, to maintain exposure to staff and the public in accordance with relevant regulatory dose constraints.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiation ProtectionAdultBrainCesium RadioisotopesChildCollagenFemaleHumansPregnancyCesium-131Cesium RadioisotopesCollagenbrachytherapybrain metastasesradiation safety

Identifiers

PMID36109179
PMCPMC9588267
OpenAlexW4295911098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.