Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109065›Full record

ReviewGlobal health, science and practice2022

The Use of Research for Health Systems Policy Development and Implementation in Mozambique: A Descriptive Study.

Maria Isabel Cambe, Carlos Botão, Janeth Dulá, Elídio Muamine, Sérgio Mahumane, Carla Alberto, Sérgio Chicumbe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health, science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Isabel CambeHealth Systems Program, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique. belacambe@yahoo.com.
Carlos BotãoHealth Systems Program, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Janeth DuláHealth Systems Program, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Elídio MuamineHealth Systems Program, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sérgio MahumaneHealth Systems Program, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Carla AlbertoHealth Systems Program, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sérgio ChicumbeNational Directorate of Surveys and Health Observation, National Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is generating an increasing amount of evidence in Mozambique, where implementation of a wide range of public health policies and interventions, and innovative technologies and solutions, is underway. We used qualitative methods to explore the relationship between HPSR and policy development and implementation in Mozambique. We conducted a literature review and in-depth interviews with researchers, experts, and policy makers. Through our analysis, we assessed barriers to the use of research evidence in the development and implementation of national health policies and identified potential opportunities to improve evidence use in this context.We found an increasing number of research institutions producing solid scientific evidence in the country, with activities in health in general and health systems specifically. There is also a growing trend for decision makers and policy makers to use the results of research during the design, formulation, and implementation of health policies. Most HPSR conducted in Mozambique is funded by international donors and focused on research questions of international interest. Therefore, research generated in Mozambique does not always address questions that are relevant to the local health system development agenda.While Mozambique has a lot of "gray literature" outlets, few of its publications support the translation of research evidence into policy. Much of the evidence generated in country is disseminated through project reports and briefings, not peer-reviewed literature. Furthermore, when the research evidence generated is not locally relevant, results may be published only in English and in scientific articles, instead of in formats useful to Mozambican policy makers-to the detriment of national-level understanding and use. We recommend that research institutions and policy makers in Mozambique collaborate on developing a platform that consolidates HPSR, making it more accessible and useful to policy makers.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingAdministrative PersonnelGovernment ProgramsHumansMozambique

Identifiers

PMID36109065
PMCPMC9476490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.