Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109055›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2022

Drivers and Barriers to Improved Data Quality and Data-Use Practices: An Interpretative Qualitative Study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Hibret Tilahun, Biruk Abate, Hiwot Belay, Abebaw Gebeyehu, Mohammed Ahmed, Akiliu Simanesew, Wondimu Ayele, Afrah Mohammedsanni, Barbara Knittel, Yakob Wondarad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hibret TilahunJohn Snow Research and Training Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. hibretalemu@yahoo.com.
Biruk AbateEthiopian Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hiwot BelayJohn Snow Research and Training Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abebaw GebeyehuJohn Snow Research and Training Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mohammed AhmedEthiopian Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Akiliu SimanesewAddis Ababa Health Bureau, Regional Health Bureau, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wondimu AyeleAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Afrah MohammedsanniJohn Snow Research and Training Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Barbara KnittelJohn Snow Research and Training Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yakob WondaradEthiopian Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute · ETGovernment of Ethiopia · ETAddis Ababa University · ETEthiopian Space Science and Technology Institute · ETRegional Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn objective of the Information Revolution Roadmap of Ethiopia's Health Sector Transformation Plan was to improve health management information system (HMIS) data quality and data use at the point of health service delivery. We aimed to assess drivers of and barriers to improving HMIS data quality and use, focusing on key Information Revolution strategies including Connected Woreda, capacity building, performance monitoring teams, and motivational incentives.

methodsWe conducted an interpretative qualitative study across all 11 health centers in 3 subcities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Yeka, Akaki-Kaliti, and Ledeta. A total of 40 key informant interviews and 6 focus group discussions with a total of 43 discussants were conducted. We coded information gathered line-by-line and grouped responses under thematic codes as they emerged. Findings were triangulated and validated.

resultsOur findings indicate that the main drivers of data quality and use at the point of service delivery were the use of the Connected Woreda strategy and its tools, capacity-building activities including mentorship, performance monitoring-team activities that led to active leadership engagement, and motivational incentives for data producers and users. Barriers to optimal data-use practices were the use of duplicative data collection tools at health facilities, under-developed health information system infrastructure, inadequate health information technician staffing and capacity limitations at the health facility level, insufficient leadership commitment, and unfavorable health worker attitudes toward data. DISCUSSION: Improvements in quality and use of HMIS data at health facilities are expected to result in delivering better-quality health services to the community as data enable health workers to identify gaps in health care, fix them, and monitor improvements. Future investments should focus on strengthening the promising data-use practices, resolving bottlenecks caused by duplicative data collection tools, enhancing individual and institutional capacity, addressing suboptimal health worker attitudes toward data, and overcoming infrastructure and connectivity challenges.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyHealth FacilitiesEthiopiaFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID36109055
PMCPMC9476478
OpenAlexW4296033470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.