Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36109016›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

The challenge of ensuring elderly people can access their health insurance entitlements: a mixed methods study on the Republic of Srpska's Protector of Patients' Health Insurance Entitlements.

Stela Stojisavljević, Bosiljka Đikanović, Luka Vončina, Kerry Scott, Zubin Shroff, Dijana Manigoda, Savka Štrbac, Borut Bosančić, Inke Mathauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stela StojisavljevićPublic Health Institute of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina stela.stojisavljevic@phi.rs.ba.
Bosiljka ĐikanovićInstitute of Social Medicine, University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, Beograd, Serbia.
Luka VončinaIndependent Researcher, Zagreb, Croatia.
Kerry ScottIndependent Research Consultant, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-9637
Zubin ShroffWHO Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0582-8582
Dijana ManigodaPublic Health Institute of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Savka ŠtrbacPublic Health Institute of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Borut BosančićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Inke MathauerHGF, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare utilisation requires knowing one's entitlements and how to access them (navigation) and having access to grievance redressal when entitlements are denied. To ensure citizen access to and use of health insurance entitlements, the Health Insurance Fund established an initiative called the Protector of Patients' Health Insurance Entitlements (PPHIE). PPHIEs are supposed to provide patient navigation and grievance redressal services. This paper explores to what extent this initiative meets its objectives and is used by the elderly in rural areas.

methodsThis study employed a mixed methods approach. We conducted in-depth interviews with elderly patients in rural areas, PPHIEs, health providers and health insurance managers (N=39), as well as focus groups (N=5) and a household survey (N=715) with elderly rural patients. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis, and the household survey results were analysed using descriptive statistics.

resultsThe majority of elderly patients were not aware of the PPHIE initiative and instead received patient navigation support from their healthcare providers. The PPHIE programme was poorly publicised among the population. Although PPHIEs had a mandate to pursue grievance redressal they rarely did so, and their role in the system was more symbolic than functional.

conclusionWhile healthcare providers have (by default) filled the navigation role left by inactive PPHIEs, the grievance redressal role remains unfilled. Information about health insurance entitlements and access to grievance redressal must be provided through visible, accessible and efficient mechanisms that should be continuously monitored and improved.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInsurance, HealthAgedHealth PersonnelHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural PopulationHealth insuranceHealth policy

Identifiers

PMID36109016
PMCPMC9476123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.