Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108798›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Psychedelics and schizophrenia: Distinct alterations to Bayesian inference.

Hardik Rajpal, Pedro A M Mediano, Fernando E Rosas, Christopher B Timmermann, Stefan Brugger, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Anil K Seth, Daniel Bor, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Henrik J Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Learning as the unifying mechanism of psychedelic action.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Induction of Dissociative States: A Meta-Analysis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Hardik RajpalCentre for Complexity Science, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom; Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom; Public Policy Program, The Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: h.rajpal15@imperial.ac.uk.
Pedro A M MedianoDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: pmediano@imperial.ac.uk.
Fernando E RosasCentre for Complexity Science, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Data Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Christopher B TimmermannCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stefan BruggerCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, United Kingdom; Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Suresh MuthukumaraswamySchool of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Anil K SethSchool of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, United Kingdom; CIFAR Program on Brain, Mind, and Consciousness, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel BorDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Robin L Carhart-HarrisCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Psychedelics Division, Neuroscape, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, US.
Henrik J JensenCentre for Complexity Science, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom; Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Queen Mary University of London · GBCanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAImperial College London · GBThe Alan Turing Institute · GBTokyo Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N0137941/1Wellcome Trust 210920Wellcome Trust 210920/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia and states induced by certain psychotomimetic drugs may share some physiological and phenomenological properties, but they differ in fundamental ways: one is a crippling chronic mental disease, while the others are temporary, pharmacologically-induced states presently being explored as treatments for mental illnesses. Building towards a deeper understanding of these different alterations of normal consciousness, here we compare the changes in neural dynamics induced by LSD and ketamine (in healthy volunteers) against those associated with schizophrenia, as observed in resting-state M/EEG recordings. While both conditions exhibit increased neural signal diversity, our findings reveal that this is accompanied by an increased transfer entropy from the front to the back of the brain in schizophrenia, versus an overall reduction under the two drugs. Furthermore, we show that these effects can be reproduced via different alterations of standard Bayesian inference applied on a computational model based on the predictive processing framework. In particular, the effects observed under the drugs are modelled as a reduction of the precision of the priors, while the effects of schizophrenia correspond to an increased precision of sensory information. These findings shed new light on the similarities and differences between schizophrenia and two psychotomimetic drug states, and have potential implications for the study of consciousness and future mental health treatments.

Indexed as

HallucinogensKetamineSchizophreniaBayes TheoremBrainHumansHallucinogensKetamineInformation theoryPredictive processingPsychedelicsSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36108798
PMCPMC7614773
OpenAlexW4296009463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.