Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108657›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2022

Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial.

Sungjune Kim, Evan Wuthrick, Dukagjin Blakaj, Zeynep Eroglu, Claire Verschraegen, Ram Thapa, Matthew Mills, Khaled Dibs, Casey Liveringhouse, Jeffery Russell and 26 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03071406 (A Phase 2, Randomized, Multi-institutional Study of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03071406 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 2, Randomized, Multi-institutional Study of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteRan2017 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsMerkel Cell Carcinoma, Skin CancerArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: recommendations from the DEGRO Dermatooncology Working Group.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sungjune KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA; Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA. Electronic address: sungjune.kim@moffitt.org.
Evan WuthrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Dukagjin BlakajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Zeynep ErogluDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Claire VerschraegenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ram ThapaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Matthew MillsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Khaled DibsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Casey LiveringhouseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jeffery RussellDepartment of Head and Neck and Cutaneous Oncology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jimmy J CaudellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Ahmad TarhiniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Joseph MarkowitzDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Kari KendraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Richard WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Dung-Tsa ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Anders BerglundDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Lauren MichaelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Mia AokiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Min-Hsuan WangDepartment of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Imene HamaidiDepartment of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Pingyan ChengDepartment of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Janis de la IglesiaDepartment of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Robbert J SlebosDepartment of Head and Neck Endocrine Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Christine H ChungDepartment of Head and Neck Endocrine Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Todd C KnepperDepartment of Precision Medicine, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Carlos M Moran-SeguraDepartment of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jonathan V NguyenDepartment of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Bradford A PerezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Trevor RoseDepartment of Radiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Louis HarrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jane L MessinaDepartment of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Vernon K SondakDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Kenneth Y TsaiDepartment of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Nikhil I KhushalaniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Andrew S BrohlDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Role of Sirt2 in T Cell Metabolism - ExtensionR37CA248298 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI Sungjune Kim · 2021 to 2026
$2.2M
Finding Synergy with Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy for Patients with Lung CancerK08CA231454 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI PEREZ, BRADFORD A. · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
Epigenetic Modulation of Immune Tolerance by Ionizing Radiation and ChemotherapyK08CA194273 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI KIM, SUNGJUNE · 2016 to 2020
$821k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA194273NCI NIH HHS K08 CA231454NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R37 CA248298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma is among the most aggressive and lethal of primary skin cancers, with a high rate of distant metastasis. Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy is currently standard of care for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. We assessed treatment with combined nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy or following previous treatment with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monotherapy.

methodsIn this randomised, open label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults from two cancer sites in the USA (one in Florida and one in Ohio) to group A (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab) or group B (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab plus SBRT) in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically proven advanced stage (unresectable, recurrent, or stage IV) Merkel cell carcinoma, a minimum of two tumour lesions measureable by CT, MRI or clinical exam, and tumour tissue available for exploratory biomarker analysis. Patients were stratified by previous immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) status to receive nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks (group A) or the same schedule of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with the addition of SBRT to at least one tumour site (24 Gy in three fractions at week 2; group B). Patients had to have at least two measurable sites of disease so one non-irradiated site could be followed for response. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Response was assessed every 12 weeks. Safety was assessed in all patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03071406.

findings50 patients (25 in both group A and group B) were enrolled between March 14, 2017, and Dec 21, 2021, including 24 ICI-naive patients (13 [52%] of 25 group A patients and 11 [44%] of 25 group B patients]) and 26 patients with previous ICI (12 [48%] of 25 group A patients and 14 [56%] of 25 group B patients]). One patient in group B did not receive SBRT due to concerns about excess toxicity. Median follow-up was 14·6 months (IQR 9·1-26·5). Two patients in group B were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because the target lesions were irradiated and so the patients were deemed non-evaluable. Of the ICI-naive patients, 22 (100%) of 22 (95% CI 82-100) had an objective response, including nine (41% [95% CI 21-63]) with complete response. Of the patients who had previously had ICI exposure, eight (31%) of 26 patients (95% CI 15-52) had an objective response and four (15% [5-36]) had a complete response. No significant differences in ORR were observed between groups A (18 [72%] of 25 patients) and B (12 [52%] of 23 patients; p=0·26). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 10 (40%) of 25 patients in group A and 8 (32%) of 25 patients in group B.

interpretationFirst-line combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma showed a high ORR with durable responses and an expected safety profile. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed clinical benefit in patients with previous anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 treatment. Addition of SBRT did not improve efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab represents a new first-line and salvage therapeutic option for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma.

fundingBristol Myers Squibb Rare Population Malignancy Program.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellRadiosurgerySkin NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabReceptors, Death DomainB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabReceptors, Death Domain

Identifiers

PMID36108657
PMCPMC9533323
OpenAlexW4295329014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.