Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108596›Full record

ReviewNephron2023

Myeloid Response to Acute Kidney Injury.

William T Nash, Marissa S Yee, Mark D Okusa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nephron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ST2 Signaling Regulates Innate Immune Responses in Kidney Injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William T NashDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Marissa S YeeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mark D OkusaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Sphingolipids in Acute Kidney Injury and Disease ProgressionR01DK085259 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI OKUSA, MARK DOUGLAS · 2010 to 2023
$5.0M
Leukocyte Trafficking in Acute Renal FailureR01DK062324 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI OKUSA, MARK DOUGLAS · 2003 to 2016
$4.4M
Neuroimmune Regulation of Acute Kidney InjuryR01DK123248 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Mark Douglas Okusa · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
ADENOSINE AND RENAL INJURYR01DK056223 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI OKUSA, MARK DOUGLAS · 2000 to 2009
$1.9M
The University of Virginia Kidney Technology Development Research Education Program (VA K-TUTOR)R25DK124918 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GUILFORD, WILLIAM H, OKUSA, MARK DOUGLAS · 2020 to 2024
$699k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056223NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062324NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085259NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123248NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK124918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyeloid cells form an important element of the response to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). While the mononuclear phagocyte system is complex and difficult to study, our knowledge of the cells involved and their impacts has been steadily increasing. However, there is still need to rigorously define and separate the functions of discreet myeloid populations in the kidney. The relatively recent distinction between resident macrophages and infiltrating monocytes in the kidney is an important advance that will enhance our understanding of the various roles of distinct myeloid populations, but specific tools are needed to rigorously define the contributions of each to injury, repair, and the transition to chronic disease. SUMMARY: Resident macrophages in the kidney form a network with various supportive roles during development and homeostasis. While the classification of these cells has been frequently convoluted in the literature, evidence for their roles during injury and repair is starting to accumulate. Current indications suggest they may have a minimal role during injury processes but may be important during the recovery phase. However, their involvement may also be dependent on their activation state in response to environmental cues. Investigations of the M1/M2 phenotype of myeloid cells have shed some light on the phenotypes that contribute to the manifestation of injury and/or recovery, but it is still difficult to form detailed conclusions. Here we will discuss the potential involvement of resident cells in these processes and the use of the M1/M2 system for defining the myeloid response following IRI. KEY MESSAGES: There is a need for additional specific analysis of the contribution of resident versus recruited myeloid cells to injury, recovery, and chronic disease in the kidney. In addition, the contribution of myeloid activation states that extend beyond simple M1/M2 classification is an important area that needs close attention. Our ability to assess resident cells is growing, and awareness of the shortcoming of the M1/M2 system is also increasing. These are promising developments which bode well for the future of kidney injury and disease research.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryReperfusion InjuryHumansKidneyMacrophagesMonocytesAcute kidney injuryAcute renal failureCKDInflammationResident macrophages

Identifiers

PMID36108596
PMCPMC9928602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.