Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108430›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2022

How the COVID-19 pandemic divides society: Towards a better understanding of differences between supporters and opponents of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Germany.

Stefanie Jung, Tillmann H C Krüger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefanie JungDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Clinical Psychology and Sexual Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: dr.s.jung@outlook.de.
Tillmann H C KrügerDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Clinical Psychology and Sexual Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany; Center for Systems Neuroscience, Hanover, Germany. Electronic address: krueger.tillmann@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implemented COVID-19 containment measures have been fiercely discussed in Germany and corona-related protests have emerged. We assessed mental health in response to the lockdown in Germany and aimed at detecting factors differentiating opponents and supporters of the COVID-19 containment measures. Using a cross-sectional online survey (n = 1219) with a mixed-methods approach, we found increased levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms (PHQ-4 and GAD-7), overall lower well-being (WHO-5), worsened sleep, increased prevalence of interpersonal violence (5.2%) as well as more pronounced irritability including anger and aggression compared to pre-COVID-19 times for all participants. Moreover, opponents demonstrated a more pronounced mental burden with more depression and anxiety, more anger and coping difficulties compared to supporters. In line with previous research, we found opponents to be well-educated, financially stable and strongly estranged by their political institutions. Additionally, applying regression analysis, we found anxiety and negative self-concept to differentiate between opponents and supporters of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Qualitative data confirms an increase in mental burden. Taken together, we identify a more vulnerable group opposing COVID-19 containment measures. Our results inform the public about opponents' motives, concerns and needs and open another perspective on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related containment measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionGermanyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalCorona lockdown opponentsCoronavirusCOVID-19LockdownMental health

Identifiers

PMID36108430
PMCPMC9450499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.