ArticleJournal of pediatric nursing
Best shot: A motivational interviewing approach to address vaccine hesitancy in pediatric outpatient settings.
Article in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06489236 (Effectiveness of an Intervention on Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pediatric Nurses and Pediatricians), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of an Intervention on Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pediatric Nurses and Pediatricians: A Mixed Methods Study
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in the WHO European Region and in North America (United States and Canada): A Systematic Review.Public health reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Addressing vaccine hesitancy: A systematic review comparing the efficacy of motivational versus educational interventions on vaccination uptake.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A field test of empathetic refutational and motivational interviewing to address vaccine hesitancy among patients.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Vaccines in the Pediatric Population: A Focus on Cardiac Patients.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024Review
- Examining General Vaccine Acceptance and COVID-19 Vaccine Intention: Comparison across Pharmacies in California and Ohio.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Protecting pregnant people & infants against influenza: A landscape review of influenza vaccine hesitancy during pregnancy and strategies for vaccine promotion.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Review
- Caregiver Willingness to Participate in Pediatric Clinical Research During COVID-19.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersArticle
- Motivational interviewing approach and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Correspondence.Journal of pediatric nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaccine hesitancy in parents and childhood vaccine refusal is increasing. A standard of care to address this problem has not been identified. PURPOSE: To identify if the use of motivational interviewing by pediatric providers during routine well child visits, when compared to standard of care, would increase vaccine rates in children 0-12 months of age. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were also investigated.
methodsA quasi-experimental study was completed on a convenience sample of pediatric providers (N = 6) and caregivers of children 0-12 months of age (N = 66). Four providers were trained to use motivational interviewing. During the well child visit the Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines survey was completed, and the motivational interviewing intervention was implemented. Clinic's data were compared with other clinic data of non-trained providers.
findingsVaccine refusal/delays rate was 11.4% among caregivers. Vaccine refusal rate decreased after the intervention (9.00% pre-intervention and 6.40% post-intervention). An ordinal regression identified caregivers with higher vaccine hesitancy scores and more children were more likely to delay or refuse vaccines, while caregivers ≥30 years or with high income were less likely to delay/refuse vaccines. A difference in difference analysis identified that an additional 2.6% of children received vaccines when seen by trained providers compared to non-trained (β = -0.330, OR = 0.719, p = 0.470). DISCUSSION: Findings indicate a condensed motivational interviewing education session may be clinically significant in decreasing vaccine hesitancy among this population. APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: A more robust study to confirm these findings is recommended prior to practice implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.