Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108286›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

HPV vaccine intention among university students during suspension of active recommendation in Japan.

Tomoya Suzuki, Yu Ota, Natsuya Sakata, Nozomi Fujita, Makoto Kamatsuka, Kengo Nagashima, Junko Hirayama, Naoko Fujita, Kuniko Shiga, Noriaki Oyama and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tomoya SuzukiSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Yu OtaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Natsuya SakataSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Nozomi FujitaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Makoto KamatsukaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Kengo NagashimaBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko HirayamaDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Naoko FujitaLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Biological Production, Faculty of Bioresource Science, Akita Prefectural University, Akita City, Akita, Japan.
Kuniko ShigaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Akita College of Nursing, Akita, Japan.
Noriaki OyamaDepartment of Gynecology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Yukihiro TeradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Kyoko NomuraDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Japan, active recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine was withheld between 2013 and 2021 due to adverse reaction reports. This resulted in low vaccine coverage with reports from less than 1%. This study aimed to investigate if knowledge and health-belief related factors associated with vaccine intention among young adolescents with the hope that our findings may be helpful in promotion campaigns. We recruited students in four colleges and universities in Akita Prefecture from 2020 to 2021 who had never been vaccinated. A total of 318 students (male 54%, mean age 21 years) responded to a self-administered questionnaire; only 6% reported immediate vaccine intention, and 61% reported no such intention or "do not know." The correct percentages of 20-item knowledge about HPV vaccine-related morbidity, mortality, and prevention were very low regardless of gender (average males 41.4% vs. females 39.6%). Multivariable logistic regression models demonstrated that in males, higher levels of literacy, perceived susceptibility, and place for vaccination (logistical barrier) were associated with HPV vaccine intention, whereas "no need now" was associated with less intention. In females, a higher level of knowledge was significantly associated with vaccine intention, whereas "concerns of adverse effects" were associated with less intention.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntentionMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesVaccinationYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinesactive recommendationHPV vaccinesJapanuniversity studentsvaccine acceptabilityVaccine intention

Identifiers

PMID36108286
PMCPMC9746521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.