Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108272›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Denoising diffusion weighted imaging data using convolutional neural networks.

Hu Cheng, Sophia Vinci-Booher, Jian Wang, Bradley Caron, Qiuting Wen, Sharlene Newman, Franco Pestilli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Parameter Estimation for the Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-diffusional Kurtosis Imaging Model Using Synthetic Q-space Learning Toward Breast Tumor Diagnosis.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Self Supervised Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for Abdominal DW-MRI.Computational diffusion MRI. CDMRI (Workshop) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hu ChengDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-4837
Sophia Vinci-BooherDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3626-146X
Jian WangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
Bradley CaronDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems and Center for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4486-1203
Qiuting WenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7885-4036
Sharlene NewmanAlabama Life Research Institute, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5575-8535
Franco PestilliDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems and Center for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-0494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with multiple, high b-values is critical for extracting tissue microstructure measurements; however, high b-value DWI images contain high noise levels that can overwhelm the signal of interest and bias microstructural measurements. Here, we propose a simple denoising method that can be applied to any dataset, provided a low-noise, single-subject dataset is acquired using the same DWI sequence. The denoising method uses a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and deep learning to learn from a low-noise dataset, voxel-by-voxel. The trained model can then be applied to high-noise datasets from other subjects. We validated the 1D-CNN denoising method by first demonstrating that 1D-CNN denoising resulted in DWI images that were more similar to the noise-free ground truth than comparable denoising methods, e.g., MP-PCA, using simulated DWI data. Using the same DWI acquisition but reconstructed with two common reconstruction methods, i.e. SENSE1 and sum-of-square, to generate a pair of low-noise and high-noise datasets, we then demonstrated that 1D-CNN denoising of high-noise DWI data collected from human subjects showed promising results in three domains: DWI images, diffusion metrics, and tractography. In particular, the denoised images were very similar to a low-noise reference image of that subject, more than the similarity between repeated low-noise images (i.e. computational reproducibility). Finally, we demonstrated the use of the 1D-CNN method in two practical examples to reduce noise from parallel imaging and simultaneous multi-slice acquisition. We conclude that the 1D-CNN denoising method is a simple, effective denoising method for DWI images that overcomes some of the limitations of current state-of-the-art denoising methods, such as the need for a large number of training subjects and the need to account for the rectified noise floor.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID36108272
PMCPMC9477507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.