ArticlePloS one2022
Perceptions and attitudes of ICU physicians toward antibiotics prescribing and resistance: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU physicians on antimicrobial use and resistance: a scoping review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- The pharmacists' interventions after a Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) establishment during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimAntibiotic resistance is a major emphasis in intensive care units (ICUs). Better understanding of ICU physicians' perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge about antimicrobial prescribing practices could facilitate more effective interventions in fighting antimicrobial resistance in Egyptian ICUs and establishing a proper Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.
methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted including 92 physicians distributed across the different types of Egyptian healthcare institutions in two cities of Egypt; Cairo and El Monufia. Over a period of three months, started in December 2019 and ended in February 2020.
resultsA total of 92 Egyptian physicians were included in the study. Seventy (76.1%) of the surveyed physician strongly agreed and 22 (23.9%) agreed that antibiotic resistance is a worldwide problem. Moreover, 50 (54.3%) strongly agreed and 40 (43.4%) agreed that it is a problem in their hospitals while only 2 (2.1%) disagreed. Poor hand hygiene (67.5%), poor infection control practices by healthcare professionals (63.9%) as well as wrong practices in the management of invasive devices (68.7%), and poor environmental cleaning practices (63.4%) were considered very important causes of AMR by the majority of the surveyed ICU physicians. Almost all of the physicians (95%) rated an advice from a clinical pharmacist as very or moderately helpful intervention, while (52%) declared an advice from a microbiologist or an infectious disease specialist as very helpful.
conclusionThe results of the present study showed that the Egyptian ICU physicians have remarkable knowledge regarding antibiotic resistance as a worldwide problem and a high sensibility toward the problem in their hospitals. The study also showed that implementation of proper AMS is an urgent need as physicians answers for the different questions in the survey showed that their attitudes and perceptions regarding antibiotic resistance and their way in prescription could be modified and improved if AMS programs with suitable training programs and local guidelines are provided among different types of Egyptian hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.