ArticlePloS one2022
Individual and intimate-partner factors associated with cervical cancer screening in Central Uganda.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Information-Seeking on HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Indonesia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Facilitators and Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in a Rural District of Northeastern Uganda, a Qualitative Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- High-risk HPV and bacterial STIs in a primary screening population in rural Hainan, China: prevalence, co-infection, and association with cervical abnormalities.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Health-seeking behaviour of rural women regarding cervical cancer prevention in Namibia: A qualitative study.Journal of public health in Africa · 2026Article
- Cervical cancer screening and its associated factors among women of reproductive age in senegal: evidence from 2023 continuous demographic and health survey in Senegal.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Challenges and Opportunities of Male Partner Involvement in Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in Central Kenya: A Qualitative Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Identifying Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Sub-Saharan Africa Using Machine Learning: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Understanding the role of the husband in supporting early detection, diagnosis, and treatment for breast cancer patients in Northern Tanzania: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer screening uptake and its associated factor in Sub-Sharan Africa: a machine learning approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Addressing Domestic Abuse Among Couples Experiencing Breast or Gynecologic Cancer in Africa.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Poor Cervical Cancer Knowledge and Awareness among Women and Men in the Eastern Cape Province Rural Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Male involvement in female partners' screening for breast and cervical cancers in Southwest Nigeria.PloS one · 2023Article
- Sexual Behaviors and Intimate Relationships of Sexual Partners of Young Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Qualitative Study.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda: Determinants of Past Screening and Post-Education Uptake; A Cross-Sectional Survey.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate-partner factors have a significant effect on the uptake of services that affect maternal reproductive health outcomes. There is limited research on intimate-partner factors associated with cervical cancer screening. Therefore, this article examines the intimate-partner correlates of cervical cancer screening among married women in Central Uganda. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Wakiso and Nakasongola districts in Central Uganda. A total of 656 married women aged 25-49 participated in the study. Frequency distributions for descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-squared tests were done to identify the association of selected individual explanatory variables and intimate-partner factors with cervical cancer screening. Finally, multivariable complementary log-log regressions were used to estimate intimate-partner factors associated with women's cervical cancer screening uptake in Central Uganda. About 2 in 10 (20%) of the participants had been screened for cervical cancer. The following characteristics when examined separately in relation to the uptake of cervical cancer screening service and were significant: woman's age, education attainment, occupation, wealth index, parity, male partner's age, and male partner's emotional support. After adjusting for independent factors, cervical cancer screening was significantly associated with women who had; attained secondary (AOR = 2.19; CI 1.18-4.06) compared to none/ primary education, and received partner's emotional support (AOR = 30.06; CI 13.44-67.20) compared to those who did not receive partner's emotional support. In Central Uganda, cervical cancer screening among married women was significantly associated with women's education, and partner's emotional support. These factors point to the importance of intimate-partner factors. Therefore, more effort should be directed at encouraging men's participation. This should be supplemented with empowering women through education to increase uptake of screening services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.