Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36108065›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

A forty-year review of Rocky Mountain spotted fever cases in California shows clinical and epidemiologic changes.

Anne M Kjemtrup, Kerry Padgett, Christopher D Paddock, Sharon Messenger, Jill K Hacker, Tina Feiszli, Michael Melgar, Marco E Metzger, Renjie Hu, Vicki L Kramer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Rocky Mountain spotted fever.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne M KjemtrupCalifornia Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5788-7621
Kerry PadgettCalifornia Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9535-3401
Christopher D PaddockCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sharon MessengerCalifornia Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-7267
Jill K HackerCalifornia Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7063-6827
Tina FeiszliCalifornia Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-5126
Michael MelgarSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-9854
Marco E MetzgerCalifornia Department of Public Health, Ontario, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6560-0678
Renjie HuCalifornia Department of Public Health, Ontario, California, United States of America.
Vicki L KramerCalifornia Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-9200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a life-threatening tick-borne disease documented in North, Central, and South America. In California, RMSF is rare; nonetheless, recent fatal cases highlight ecological cycles of the two genera of ticks, Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus, known to transmit the disease. These ticks occur in completely different habitats (sylvatic and peridomestic, respectively) resulting in different exposure risks for humans. This study summarizes the demographic, exposure, and clinical aspects associated with the last 40 years of reported RMSF cases to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Seventy-eight RMSF cases with onsets from 1980 to 2019 were reviewed. The incidence of RMSF has risen in the last 20 years from 0.04 cases per million to 0.07 cases per million (a two-fold increase in reports), though the percentage of cases that were confirmed dropped significantly from 72% to 25% of all reported cases. Notably, Hispanic/Latino populations saw the greatest rise in incidence. Cases of RMSF in California result from autochthonous and out-of-state exposures. During the last 20 years, more cases reported exposure in Southern California or Mexico than in the previous 20 years. The driver of these epidemiologic changes is likely the establishment and expansion of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks in Southern California and on-going outbreaks of RMSF in northern Mexico. Analysis of available electronically reported clinical data from 2011 to 2019 showed that 57% of reported cases presented with serious illness requiring hospitalization with a 7% mortality. The difficulty in recognizing RMSF is due to a non-specific clinical presentation; however, querying patients on the potential of tick exposure in both sylvatic and peridomestic environments may facilitate appropriate testing and treatment.

Indexed as

RhipicephalusRhipicephalus sanguineusRocky Mountain Spotted FeverAnimalsCaliforniaDisease OutbreaksHumans

Identifiers

PMID36108065
PMCPMC9514610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.