Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment.

Satomi Takei, Tomohiko Ai, Takamasa Yamamoto, Gene Igawa, Takayuki Kanno, Minoru Tobiume, Makoto Hiki, Kaori Saito, Abdullah Khasawneh, Mitsuru Wakita and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satomi TakeiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5519-7408
Tomohiko AiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-0227
Takamasa YamamotoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Gene IgawaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki KannoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru TobiumeDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto HikiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori SaitoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abdullah KhasawnehDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8324-4048
Mitsuru WakitaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeki MisawaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi MiidaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi OkuzawaDepartment of Research Support Utilizing Bioresource Bank, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadaki SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhisa TakahashiDepartment of Research Support Utilizing Bioresource Bank, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshio NaitoDepartment of Research Support Utilizing Bioresource Bank, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-9930
Yoko TabeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3734-0346
Juntendo University · JPJuntendo University Hospital · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is highly expected to evaluate immune status, vaccine response, and antiviral therapy. The Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys® anti-S) was developed to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. We sought to investigate whether Elecsys® anti-S can be used to predict neutralizing activities in patients' serums using an authentic virus neutralization assay. One hundred forty-six serum samples were obtained from 59 patients with COVID-19 at multiple time points. Of the 59 patients, 44 cases were included in Group M (mild 23, moderate 21) and produced 84 samples (mild 35, moderate 49), while 15 cases were included in Group S (severe 11, critical 4) and produced 62 samples (severe 43, critical 19). The neutralization assay detected 73% positive cases, and Elecsys® anti-S and Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Elecsys® anti-N) showed 72% and 66% positive cases, respectively. A linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-S assay and the neutralization assay were highly correlated (r = 0.7253, r2 = 0.5261) than a linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-N and neutralization assay (r = 0.5824, r2 = 0.3392). The levels of Elecsys® anti-S antibody and neutralizing activities were significantly higher in Group S than in Group M after 6 weeks from onset of symptoms (p < 0.05). Conversely, the levels of Elecsys® anti-N were comparable in both groups. Three immunosuppressed patients, including cancer patients, showed low levels of anti-S and anti-N antibodies and neutralizing activities throughout the measurement period, indicating the need for careful follow-up. Our data indicate that Elecsys® anti-S can predict the neutralization antibodies in COVID-19.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsHumansImmunoassayNeutralization TestsSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID36107911
PMCPMC9477342
OpenAlexW4295901873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.