Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107870›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Patient perceptions by race of educational animations about living kidney donation made for a diverse population.

Maria M Keller, Todd Lucas, Renee Cadzow, Thomas Feeley, Laurene Tumiel Berhalter, Liise Kayler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria M KellerDepartment of Community Health and Behavior, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-0812
Todd LucasDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, Michigan, United States of America.
Renee CadzowDepartment of Health Services Administration, D'Youville College, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Thomas FeeleyDepartment of Communication, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Laurene Tumiel BerhalterDepartment of Family Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Liise KaylerTransplant and Kidney Care Regional Center of Excellence, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis qualitative study sought to identify potential design and delivery alterations to inform cultural adaptation of educational animations about living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT)-previously developed for a diverse population-to better fit Black Americans' needs.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of 88 transcripts derived from interviews and focus groups conducted with diverse target users (62 kidney failure patients, 36 prior/potential donors, and 11 care partners) to develop 12 animations about LDKT, named KidneyTIME. Statements were abstracted and coded pertaining to cognitive and communication barriers to LDKT, and the perceived value of using the videos to learn and share the information with social network members using content analysis. Incidence counts of each content code were also calculated to assess differences between Black and non-Black patients.

resultsCognitive barrier codes included lack of knowledge, ambivalence, and concern for donor. Communication barrier codes included reluctance and difficulty talking about LDKT. Cognitive facilitating codes included attention-getting, efficient learning, manageable content, emotional impact, and new knowledge. Communication facilitating codes included delivery through many dissemination channels and broadly shareable. Compared to non-black patients (n = 33) Black patients (n = 29) more often stated concern for donor and reluctance/difficulty talking about LDKT as barriers, and less often stated efficient learning and manageable content as facilitators.

conclusionFindings highlight the value of LDKT informational content that is visually appealing, digestible, non-threatening, and highly shareable. Heterogeneity may exist when considering access and intervention preferences in using KidneyTIME videos and highlight a potential for further cultural targeting or tailoring.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationHumansKidneyLiving DonorsTissue and Organ Harvesting

Identifiers

PMID36107870
PMCPMC9477306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.