Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Overlaying human and mosquito behavioral data to estimate residual exposure to host-seeking mosquitoes and the protection of bednets in a malaria elimination setting where indoor residual spraying and nets were deployed together.

Lucia Fernandez Montoya, Celso Alafo, Helena Martí-Soler, Mara Máquina, Kiba Comiche, Inocencia Cuamba, Khatia Munguambe, Lauren Cator, Pedro Aide, Beatriz Galatas and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Lucia Fernandez MontoyaISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-6592
Celso AlafoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.
Helena Martí-SolerISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-205X
Mara MáquinaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.
Kiba ComicheCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.
Inocencia CuambaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0001-5964-0932
Khatia MunguambeCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.
Lauren CatorImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-1490
Pedro AideCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-6529
Beatriz GalatasISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-6385
Nelson CuambaPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Dulcisaria MarrenjoPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Francisco SaúteCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Mozambique.
Krijn P PaaijmansISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4837-2818
Manhiça Health Research Centre · MZInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESImperial College London · GBMalaria Consortium · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing persistent malaria transmission that occurs after the combined deployment of indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is critical to guide malaria control and elimination efforts. This requires a detailed understanding of both human and vector behaviors at the same temporal and spatial scale. Cross-sectional human behavior evaluations and mosquito collections were performed in parallel in Magude district, Mozambique. Net use and the exact time when participant moved into each of five environments (outdoor, indoor before bed, indoor in bed, indoor after getting up, and outdoor after getting up) were recorded for individuals from three different age groups and both sexes during a dry and a rainy season. Malaria mosquitoes were collected with CDC light traps in combination with collection bottle rotators. The percentage of residual exposure to host-seeking vectors that occurred in each environment was calculated for five local malaria vectors with different biting behaviors, and the actual (at observed levels of LLIN use) and potential (i.e. if all residents had used an LLIN) personal protection conferred by LLINs was estimated. Anopheles arabiensis was responsible for more than 74% of residents' residual exposure to host-seeking vectors during the Magude project. The other four vector species (An. funestus s.s., An. parensis, An. squamosus and An. merus) were responsible for less than 10% each. The personal protection conferred by LLINs prevented only 39.2% of the exposure to host-seeking vectors that survived the implementation of both IRS and LLINs, and it differed significantly across seasons, vector species and age groups. At the observed levels of bednet use, 12.5% of all residual exposure to host-seeking vectors occurred outdoor during the evening, 21.9% indoor before going to bed, almost two thirds (64%) while people were in bed, 1.4% indoors after getting up and 0.2% outdoor after leaving the house. Almost a third of the residual exposure to host-seeking vectors (32.4%) occurred during the low transmission season. The residual bites of An. funestus s.s. and An. parensis outdoors and indoor before bedtime, of An. arabiensis indoors when people are in bed, and of An. squamosus both indoors and outdoors, are likely to have sustained malaria transmission throughout the Magude project. By increasing LLIN use, an additional 24.1% of exposure to the remaining hosts-seeking vectors could have been prevented. Since An. arabiensis, the most abundant vector, feeds primarily while people are in bed, increasing net use and net feeding inhibition (through e.g. community awareness activities and the selection of more effective LLINs) could significantly reduce the exposure to remaining host-seeking mosquitoes. Nonetheless, supplementary interventions aiming to reduce human-vector contact outdoors and/or indoors before people go to bed (e.g. through larval source management, window and eave screening, eave tubes, and spatial repellents) will be needed to reduce residual exposure to the outdoor and early biting An. funestus s.s. and An. parensis.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesMalariaAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMosquito VectorsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesInsecticidesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36107865
PMCPMC9477321
OpenAlexW4295903894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.